PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

These matters can go on for years. For a liability decision in a private hearing (this is not court so it should not have some of the timing issues of a single judge on multiple successive cases), it should be out now.

This is only one part of the decision. The panel has had long enough. Not sure where that contradicts anything I have said previously on timeline.

And by the way, this is the view of both parties. Nobody expected to be waiting for part 1 in 2026.
So what on earth is going on then?
 
Why would the charges relate to specific documents they relate to actions or in actions and even if they related to specific documents you would need others to prove or disprove that nothing has proceeded or superseded those documents
Known as a paper trail.
 
These matters can go on for years. For a liability decision in a private hearing (this is not court so it should not have some of the timing issues of a single judge on multiple successive cases), it should be out now.

This is only one part of the decision. The panel has had long enough. Not sure where that contradicts anything I have said previously on timeline.

And by the way, this is the view of both parties. Nobody expected to be waiting for part 1 in 2026.
I've given up trying to decipher your posts and gone back to the Rubik's cube.
 
So what on earth is going on then?
Bode is what’s going on mate.

This shit is just distraction. Job done, bought inferior players due to constant financial restraints and Innuendo and once again a red cartel member will win the league.

Not saying we haven't spent money. You wouldn’t know it this season.

Smoke and mirrors from the league, club and the tribunal. These companies don’t go after each other, it’s ultimately bad for business. It just so happens to be a sports arena with emotions. Throw in vested interests and media spin.

Accused in-front of the world that we were cooking the books and committing mass scale fraudulent activities with our commercial partners or even worse conducting illegal activities without their knowledge and creating bullshit accounts.

last stop on the gravy train…

Sorry mate, maybe not the answer you want. I’m blocked by many -:)
 
It’s not an excuse but this can’t be helping on field. The smear campaign has worked and the neverending wait is like a huge cloud over the club. If we are cleared we have to go to war with those responsible.
It certainly hasn’t helped.
We’ve gone from being elite from top to bottom to fighting to exist.
Definitely taken eye off the prize and focused it more on the charges.
 
I don’t know what you are on about.

The claim was that Stefan never said the time taken was out of the ordinary. I posted a clip to the contrary with a time stamp which suggested otherwise in support of another poster.

If you think it’s bollocks that’s up to you but I hear something entirely different to the claim in the video.

Not that it matters one way or another.

:) I was trying to agree with you, rather clumsily perhaps. It wasn't your comment that was bollocks, it was the original assertion that was, imho of course.
 
I am saying that there are possibly millions so if pl have scanned them all they will point the panel to the relevant ones. Surely they don't say to the panel that somewhere in them there is the incriminating evidence, try and find it.
A huge number of documents are exchanged by the parties that are responsive to various searches - times, words, custodians. Those documents are then reviewed by each party for them to cherry pick those that are relevant and support or undermine the case. The hearing itself, takes the panel through the key documents and puts them to witnesses. By the end of the hearing, a proportion of the hearing bundle (thousands of documents on a digital platform) are referred to in closings and the evidence heard. The panel will write up its decision with reference to those documents.
 
A huge number of documents are exchanged by the parties that are responsive to various searches - times, words, custodians. Those documents are then reviewed by each party for them to cherry pick those that are relevant and support or undermine the case. The hearing itself, takes the panel through the key documents and puts them to witnesses. By the end of the hearing, a proportion of the hearing bundle (thousands of documents on a digital platform) are referred to in closings and the evidence heard. The panel will write up its decision with reference to those documents.
Many thanks for that clarification of the process.
 
I don’t know what you are on about.

The claim was that Stefan never said the time taken was out of the ordinary. I posted a clip to the contrary with a time stamp which suggested otherwise in support of another poster.

If you think it’s bollocks that’s up to you but I hear something entirely different to the claim in the video.

Not that it matters one way or another.
I think you've muddled up what he was saying.
He wasn't calling you bollocks, matey, he was agreeing with us.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top