PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

The parties sat before them so they know. But the identities are a closely held secret. Amazing it has not come out.
Why are their identities such a secret?
It is quite incredible that after all this time someone hasn't "grassed them up" ..
Baffling really..
The whole thing won't affect national security. Nobody (well maybe Masters) will have to go into hiding... International economies won't fail ..
Why can't anyone involved say something like " we think we might have it all wrapped up by late spring" but actually give a year ..
I don't think it's to much to ask, or is it ?
 
They refer the club to a disciplinary process for allegedly breaching their rules and then expect the club to agree to amending the rules to suit their crazy allegations. I wouldn't care how long it takes and "how it looks for the game" - they should have thought about that before they made the allegations.

I remember some idiot club CEOs being quoted as saying they were surprised at how aggressively the club was defending itself. I had no idea what that meant at the time.

It will only make sense when a club gets kicked out of the premier league for trumped up charges & gives a statement of “no hard feelings……”
 
You’ll get change out of £700 if you fancy one.


Bit more if you want a frizz top one.



You've got to pass your hay levels to get into that profession.
 
You’ll get change out of £700 if you fancy one.


Bit more if you want a frizz top one.

Humphrey Ravenscroft - sounds like he failed the 11+ but still blagged a place at St Bede’s cos his dad “made a donation” every year.
 
The cunts charge £300 for a wig tin.

That’s worth 3 Kalvin Phillipses.
 
The club can defend its self as aggressively as its wants and challenge as much as it wants but I am sure if it’s Done nothing wrong it will have wanted it over as quick as possible assuming quick is also fair
Eefer to my earlier point, you don't insult the people they have and get away with it.
Just accept us City fans are the victims at the moment.
 
Why are their identities such a secret?
It is quite incredible that after all this time someone hasn't "grassed them up" ..
Baffling really..
The whole thing won't affect national security. Nobody (well maybe Masters) will have to go into hiding... International economies won't fail ..
Why can't anyone involved say something like " we think we might have it all wrapped up by late spring" but actually give a year ..
I don't think it's to much to ask, or is it ?
City will not accept Masters as neither scapegoat.
 
I KNOW they haven't

This will probably annoy you and I am prepared for the inevitable backlash.

You don't KNOW anything of the sort. You only KNOW what you have been told. There are only a handful of people so involved in this process that they KNOW what is really happening on a day-to-day basis so everybody else is just repeating what that handful of people want them to hear. I don't know how high up the information chain you are - second hand, third hand (probably quite high in view of your new role) - but unless you are first hand it doesn't matter. You are just repeating something you have been told.

Framing it that way doesn't make it less useful information.

I am not questioning your assessment of what you have been told, by the way - I can imagine it's probably right - just the way you present it.
 
F0ne8wIX0AMt3C9
 
This will probably annoy you and I am prepared for the inevitable backlash.

You don't KNOW anything of the sort. You only KNOW what you have been told. There are only a handful of people so involved in this process that they KNOW what is really happening on a day-to-day basis so everybody else is just repeating what that handful of people want them to hear. I don't know how high up the information chain you are - second hand, third hand (probably quite high in view of your new role) - but unless you are first hand it doesn't matter. You are just repeating something you have been told.

Framing it that way doesn't make it less useful information.

I am not questioning your assessment of what you have been told, by the way - I can imagine it's probably right - just the way you present it.

I remember lads telling me they’d bumped into Paul Lake on his recovery he’ll be back in 2 weeks. Years later I read Lakes biography & he said he’d bumped into into City fans in the Chinese & just tell them I’m back in 2 weeks despite knowing he was finished.

Anyway I bumped into Pannick in the Chinese & he said it’s imminent, in the next 2 weeks.
 
I remember lads telling me they’d bumped into Paul Lake on his recovery he’ll be back in 2 weeks. Years later I read Lakes biography & he said he’d bumped into into City fans in the Chinese & just tell them I’m back in 2 weeks despite knowing he was finished.

Anyway I bumped into Pannick in the Chinese & he said it’s imminent, in the next 2 weeks.

:) I am all in favour of posters assessing what they are told, coming to a conclusion as to it's veracity and sharing it. I just think we should be allowed the same courtesy without being told what is true and what isn't.

Just me maybe, but I hate this certainty that everyone seems to have on every subject these days. All I am asking for is rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty :)
 
:) I am all in favour of posters assessing what they are told, coming to a conclusion as to it's veracity and sharing it. I just think we should be allowed the same courtesy without being told what is true and what isn't.

Just me maybe, but I hate this certainty that everyone seems to have on every subject these days. All I am asking for is rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty :)

I think the caveat should be “I’m led to believe” which also covers I could be manipulated, lied to, bullshitted but I believe it.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top