Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 14,367
Hey I'm an auditor of 20+ years.
Mods, ban this fucker
Hey I'm an auditor of 20+ years.
I haven’t got the mental capacity to follow this thread too closely tbh, sneaked into it today for the first time in ages, thanks for the heads up
then yanks got involvedI haven’t got the mental capacity to follow this thread too closely tbh, sneaked into it today for the first time in ages, thanks for the heads up
PS I remember when football was a game, played on a football pitch
You obviously hold auditors in higher regard than I do. If there are publicly available court documents showing Sheikh Mansour’s close involvement in IPIC, and official Aabar documents confirming that he played an active role in Aabar’s business, how do City’s auditors justify the view that he had no significant influence?
Thanks for explaining, Chris. On that basis, if the Premier League has nothing beyond what’s already public, it’s more or less impossible for them to win that point.No.
It’s not about whether the auditors were wrong.
It’s about whether the Pl can show, given the auditors’ stance (including Aabars own auditors), that in saying this is not a related party transaction City were acting in bad faith.
Maybe mate, dunno. I’ve always thought it likely that journalists or wannabe journalists who don’t have City’s best interests at heart would be on here from time to time, seeing what they could find out. As well as opposing supporters on the wind-up of course.Do you think so?
I thought it was that fruitloop magic twat Harris.
Not impossible. But a very big ask based on what we know.Thanks for explaining, Chris. On that basis, if the Premier League has nothing beyond what’s already public, it’s more or less impossible for them to win that point.
I've got plenty of things wrong on here but it's how you deal with that. Express an opinion, ask a question, reframe your opinion by all means, but when you've been told a number of times that you're wrong then accept it instead of doing it to death.He may have got it wrong but he was only asking a question ffs, assume by your reaction he and you must have done history?
That's the impression I get from him. You can just sense that he isn't a blue with the continuous questioning of answers he's given.Maybe mate, dunno. I’ve always thought it likely that journalists or wannabe journalists who don’t have City’s best interests at heart would be on here from time to time, seeing what they could find out. As well as opposing supporters on the wind-up of course.
And repeat!Blimey, mate. He was only asking.
I would agree very suspicious . Were we too efficient and input our accounts information before anyone else and that's when they said GotchaAs far as I'm aware, yes. And the timing of the change was suspicious.
put him on ignore ages agoYet people keep falling for it so Keithy boy gets the attention he's looking for.
Don't feed the troll!
Yes that is why I and I suspect many more have blocked himYou must have not been following the thread closely as "Keith" keeps asking the same question over and over, framed slightly differently each time. He's an out and out wum and has been obvious for a while to my eyes.
Is this the room for an argument.....?He reminds me of that Harry Enfield character that says you don't want to do it like that, you do it like this.
Without var too!I haven’t got the mental capacity to follow this thread too closely tbh, sneaked into it today for the first time in ages, thanks for the heads up
PS I remember when football was a game, played on a football pitch
Which type of argument ? the full half hour ?Is this the room for an argument.....?
He keeps beating the same drum ;-)Yet people keep falling for it so Keithy boy gets the attention he's looking for.
Don't feed the troll!
I've told you onceWhich type of argument ? the full half hour ?