PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

You obviously hold auditors in higher regard than I do. If there are publicly available court documents showing Sheikh Mansour’s close involvement in IPIC, and official Aabar documents confirming that he played an active role in Aabar’s business, how do City’s auditors justify the view that he had no significant influence?

If?

If there were publicly available documents showing that Sheikh Mansour owned the X-Men then it would put a different complexion on things.

Either show these documents or fuck off
 
No.

It’s not about whether the auditors were wrong.

It’s about whether the Pl can show, given the auditors’ stance (including Aabars own auditors), that in saying this is not a related party transaction City were acting in bad faith.
Thanks for explaining, Chris. On that basis, if the Premier League has nothing beyond what’s already public, it’s more or less impossible for them to win that point.
 
Do you think so?
I thought it was that fruitloop magic twat Harris.
Maybe mate, dunno. I’ve always thought it likely that journalists or wannabe journalists who don’t have City’s best interests at heart would be on here from time to time, seeing what they could find out. As well as opposing supporters on the wind-up of course.
 
He may have got it wrong but he was only asking a question ffs, assume by your reaction he and you must have done history?
I've got plenty of things wrong on here but it's how you deal with that. Express an opinion, ask a question, reframe your opinion by all means, but when you've been told a number of times that you're wrong then accept it instead of doing it to death.
 
Maybe mate, dunno. I’ve always thought it likely that journalists or wannabe journalists who don’t have City’s best interests at heart would be on here from time to time, seeing what they could find out. As well as opposing supporters on the wind-up of course.
That's the impression I get from him. You can just sense that he isn't a blue with the continuous questioning of answers he's given.
Very suspicious.
 
You must have not been following the thread closely as "Keith" keeps asking the same question over and over, framed slightly differently each time. He's an out and out wum and has been obvious for a while to my eyes.
Yes that is why I and I suspect many more have blocked him
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top