PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Levy resigned because of an internal audit by the club that determined the club needed to concentrate on football instead of stadia. It always struck me as fanciful that we made him resign.


I think the smoking gun is wanting to pay £80m for Savinho……. Fucccckkkk me, may as well just say it’s a bribe ;)
 
Do you think this case is super complex? And if so, in what way?
Thousands of pages documentary evidence, loads of witnesses, loads of legal argument, 10 week hearing, multi year allegations, allegations of civil fraud etc, 10s of millions of cost on both sides, at least 6 (from memory) KCs. Undeniably complex.
 
Real progress today I feel.
Reasons for our known enemies to resign and sell up have been found that seem acceptable to all have been found. Mr Masters has had his bonus paid so perhaps we can get on with the verdict?
 
Thousands of pages documentary evidence, loads of witnesses, loads of legal argument, 10 week hearing, multi year allegations, allegations of civil fraud etc, 10s of millions of cost on both sides, at least 6 (from memory) KCs. Undeniably complex.
AI would have had an answer by the end of the day.
 
Thousands of pages documentary evidence, loads of witnesses, loads of legal argument, 10 week hearing, multi year allegations, allegations of civil fraud etc, 10s of millions of cost on both sides, at least 6 (from memory) KCs. Undeniably complex.
The volume of material or the length of the hearing isn’t necessarily a direct function of the complexity of the case. Often the most grandiose and protracted of proceedings can boil down to a very simple principle. The Jaffa Cake VAT dispute being a case in point. The principle that arose from that determination is entirely straightforward. You don’t need to be a legal professional to grasp that.

So not undeniably.

But accept it most likely is.
 
The volume of material or the length of the hearing isn’t necessarily a direct function of the complexity of the case. Often the most grandiose and protracted of proceedings can boil down to a very simple principle. The Jaffa Cake VAT dispute being a case in point. The principle that arose from that determination is entirely straightforward. You don’t need to be a legal professional to grasp that.

So not undeniably.

But accept it most likely is.
The latter is certainly a good indicator. And a combination of all of things I wrote are more. Not sure your Jaffa cake case is a good example as suspect it didn't run to anywhere near 10 weeks. Be surprised if it was 10 days. But anyone that wants to argue it is a simple case (and many here have), go for it.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top