The only chance of becoming citizens,rather than cap doffing subjects is to stay in.
I thought it was a lizardocracy.UK is a Plutocracy, knobhead;-).
As I said, I didn't see the equivalent Cameron interview, however if my decision were based on Cameron's performance elsewhere I'd be voting out. Cameron will come out of this severely weakened irrespective of the result. He's shown himself to be duplicitous and the whole pre-referendum diplomacy and supposed deal he got was extremely poor. I hope we vote to stay in, but if we do it will be in spite of Cameron, not because of him. As for Gove, he comes across well but has no answers as to how things will pan out over the next few years not that I would expect him to. Voting out is a leap of faith that the initial guaranteed downturn in the economy will turn round in a reasonable time. As long as we stay out of the Euro we will avoid the worst aspects of EU membership whilst maintaining our position.I cannot really agree with this, especially about not answering questions. For example if you think that "can you absolutely guarantee that no one will lose their jobs if Brexit wins" is a reasonable, then the answer that "No, the 73 (I think) MEPs will lose their job" has to be an excellent answer, daft as it is.
If you feel Gove was evasive what was your opinion of Cameron? Cameron, was flustered, weak and ineffective. Every single answer he gave went back to the economy being strong.... which if it is the case surely we will survive outside the EU... wouldn't we?
Scores on the doors. Cameron 3.5/10, Gove 7.5/10, Sky 4.5/10. Kay Burley was hopelessly exposed as being totally ineffective. Fasil Islam saw his chance, played to the occasion and both interviews became about him. Gove dealt with that far, far better than Cameron.
I thought it was a lizardocracy.
More like Etonocracy.
Both Cuntocracies of the highest order.
That looks like the favelas here in São Paulo.You want to vote remain? Get used to more of this. Coming to an area near you soon.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...qualid-conditions-makeshift-camps-London.html
You want to vote remain? Get used to more of this. Coming to an area near you soon.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...qualid-conditions-makeshift-camps-London.html
Should we have daily mail links on here, it's a bit nonce for my tastes
If people are going to link the Independent and the Guardian, then there's not much wrong with linking the Mail.
Should we have daily mail links on here, it's a bit nonce for my tastes
Hopefully they will produce some decent footballers ;-)That looks like the favelas here in São Paulo.
You want to bury your head and pretend it isn't happening? Right ho.
And you chose to blame immigration over the criminals exploiting them, Right ho.
And you chose to blame immigration over the criminals exploiting them, Right ho.
Albanians are mentioned in the article. They're not in the EU.What sort of logic is that? Without a queue of migrants wanting to come to this country to take your job then the people traffickers wouldn't have a market would they.
Spot on sadly. Saw a lot of this when I lived /worked in Lincolnshire for a while. Everyone involved is corrupt and there is no easy answer.The criminals wouldn't be able to exploit them without the complete free movement of people from the EU. So yes, immigration controls, or the lack of, are directly culpable.
In fact, most of the people smugglers are themselves usually EU nationals from Eastern Europe.
Albanians are mentioned in the article. They're not in the EU.
He actually makes a good point about setting a president with granting asylum. I'm sure it will get lost in the cries of racist ect.Without effective border controls who cares where they are from? We never hear of any illegal migrants being returned quickly. If they survive the crossing they just get lost in paperwork or just abscond and disappear into the black market. You want this?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...granted-Albanians-caught-trying-check-UK.html