sir baconface
Well-Known Member
The anti immigration extremes don't want a debate they aren't interested in a debate, aren't interested in facts or root causes , unthinking blame and emotion is much easier
That's the way extremes work. Thank you.
The anti immigration extremes don't want a debate they aren't interested in a debate, aren't interested in facts or root causes , unthinking blame and emotion is much easier
The boat is sinking because of nothing to do with those people it is sinking because .
Thatcher , even Blair created a society where you are all conditioned every day to resent the poor, the weak. Where is fine for a billionaire tax dodger to push the agenda that immigrants are to blame for problems. Where people who live in slums prefer to divide and blame each other for the issue rather than loom at the society that has let them down. You have a government who wants to get rid of the NHS, millionaire bankers who near bankrupted us all and still have their 5 homes and media moguls who tell you lies whilst avoiding the country in case they have to pay a penny of tax. That's why the boat is sinking
Maybe going to fix the engine or patch the holes, empty out water would be a more worthwhile exercise than standing at the back pushing people back into the water as the boat continues to sink
Why would you attempt to be ignorant of what you stand against? Utterly bizarre!This is what tickles me, they know the in-depth content of something they despise.
I fucking hate marzipan, it's why I never eat Christmas cake.
The boat is sinking because of nothing to do with those people it is sinking because .
Thatcher , even Blair created a society where you are all conditioned every day to resent the poor, the weak. Where is fine for a billionaire tax dodger to push the agenda that immigrants are to blame for problems. Where people who live in slums prefer to divide and blame each other for the issue rather than loom at the society that has let them down. You have a government who wants to get rid of the NHS, millionaire bankers who near bankrupted us all and still have their 5 homes and media moguls who tell you lies whilst avoiding the country in case they have to pay a penny of tax. That's why the boat is sinking
Maybe going to fix the engine or patch the holes, empty out water would be a more worthwhile exercise than standing at the back pushing people back into the water as the boat continues to sink
Spot on , this mentality that the poor are to blame for poverty and the rich are always deserving of wealth is awful. Yes there are worthy billionaires who create their wealth by progressing the world and yes there are leeches who exploit welfare but there are also millions condemned for life to relative poverty by their birth and where they grew up and there are also many many who make their wealth by nothing more than birth, exploitation, Ponzi economics and speculation.Can I also add that despite widespread anxiety about a shortage of housing supply and room for immigrants, there are 610,123 empty homes in England, according to the government. Of these, 205,821 have been unoccupied for six months or more, the official definition of "long-term" emptiness and many owned by the super rich as investments rather than habitations, yet we have the worst homelessness problem for decades nationwide, and have English nationals like Philip Green fucking over some people in this country while living it up in france dogding tax, he's the kind of person who should vilified by the press and dragged over the coals, not someone coming here to work and pay tax as nearly all immigrants do.
No get them in and get them to help et the boat sailing again everyone working towards the overall interest of staying afloat and getting to land. Better to right the situation than sink whilst blaming each other.So pile them all in and lecture them on nasty-wasty Maggie while they sink.
Stand against?!Why would you attempt to be ignorant of what you stand against? Utterly bizarre!
No get them in and get them to help et the boat sailing again everyone working towards the overall interest of staying afloat and getting to land. Better to right the situation than sink whilst blaming each other.
Just curious, could some of the homes be holiday homes? If so are people not entitled to by a cottage by the sea if they can afford to? Or maybe they are b&bs that are often empty outside peak times. And are some out in the sticks or in a pettiful state that you wouldn't let anyone stay in?Can I also add that despite widespread anxiety about a shortage of housing supply and room for immigrants, there are 610,123 empty homes in England, according to the government. Of these, 205,821 have been unoccupied for six months or more, the official definition of "long-term" emptiness and many owned by the super rich as investments rather than habitations, yet we have the worst homelessness problem for decades nationwide, and have English nationals like Philip Green fucking over some people in this country while living it up in france dogding tax, he's the kind of person who should vilified by the press and dragged over the coals, not someone coming here to work and pay tax as nearly all immigrants do.
And I'm off out to the supermarket with the wife to get a chicken that's been properly tortured prior to being dispatched, some cabbage that has been picked byYou are probably the most ideologically driven poster on this thread and you don't even appreciate the irony of your arguments.
Right, I'm off out with the dogs. Or to you: miserable beasts, subjugated by man and Maggie for millennia to facilitate their nefarious needs.
I don't think anyone wants to give up the biggest trade zone in the world.... It's what comes with it, free movement agreements, political integration and bundles of red tape all of which were never voted for but were foist upon us, is what people want rid of!
Spot on , this mentality that the poor are to blame for poverty and the rich are always deserving of wealth is awful. Yes there are worthy billionaires who create their wealth by progressing the world and yes there are leeches who exploit welfare but there are also millions condemned for life to relative poverty by their birth and where they grew up and there are also many many who make their wealth by nothing more than birth, exploitation, Ponzi economics and speculation.
When the wealthy leave homes sitting empty or government can't be bothered to use housing that is the fault of immigrants .
It's because tax , responsibility and society are dirty words and it is better to blame than to support, it is better divide than unite and it is better to own a better car or DVD player than educate the kids of the country.
Just curious, could some of the homes be holiday homes? If so are people not entitled to by a cottage by the sea if they can afford to? Or maybe they are b&bs that are often empty outside peak times. And are some out in the sticks or in a pettiful state that you wouldn't let anyone stay in?
You wrote -
A) If we leave, we'll put people out of work, raise prices, depress the economy and we'll pretty much all be worse off for the foreseeable future. Probably for the next 5 to 10 year and quite possibly, forever. Not only is this the projection of virtually every independent analyst, frankly it's bloody obvious.
You deliberated on the in/out options for a month, came out last week as in and have followed up that it is 'bloody obvious' that your exceptionally pessimistic view will prevail so not that bloody obvious really?
And you can see CURRENT examples of barbarism in hell-holes all over the globe. Let me guess though. That will be solely down to the legacy us nasty Brits inflicted on a lily-white world.
You misunderstand.
What is "bloody obvious" is that we will be worse off if we leave. I have never doubted that for 1 second, and frankly, it is bloody obvious. We have zero chance of negotiating a tariff-free trade deal with the EU, zero. Our trade with the EU will decline. We will have some businesses de-camping from the UK and the jobs with them. We may be able in time to offset these disadvantages with more trade elsewhere, but that will take time at best.
What is perhaps debatable is whether all this is worth it, in order to get full sovereignty back. That's what caused me to reflect for a considerable amount of time.
You misunderstand.
What is "bloody obvious" is that we will be worse off if we leave. I have never doubted that for 1 second, and frankly, it is bloody obvious. We have zero chance of negotiating a tariff-free trade deal with the EU, zero. Our trade with the EU will decline. We will have some businesses de-camping from the UK and the jobs with them. We may be able in time to offset these disadvantages with more trade elsewhere, but that will take time at best.
What is perhaps debatable is whether all this is worth it, in order to get full sovereignty back. That's what caused me to reflect for a considerable amount of time.
That's a very honest appraisal imo.You misunderstand.
What is "bloody obvious" is that we will be worse off if we leave. I have never doubted that for 1 second, and frankly, it is bloody obvious. We have zero chance of negotiating a tariff-free trade deal with the EU, zero. Our trade with the EU will decline. We will have some businesses de-camping from the UK and the jobs with them. We may be able in time to offset these disadvantages with more trade elsewhere, but that will take time at best.
What is perhaps debatable is whether all this is worth it, in order to get full sovereignty back. That's what caused me to reflect for a considerable amount of time.
There were plenty of Euro-sceptics who confidently predicted the imminent end of the Euro when the banks collapsed too.I accept there will be a period of uncertainty and that is not good, I think we can get through it though. They were predicting Armageddon after the banks collapsed and we recovered better than any other eu country.