B
B
bluemc1
Guest
De Gea is a far superior keeper and much more intelligent in his all round play than Joe Hart. I do not care about how nice he is or if he is a City lgend or not that should not stop us from telling the truth. He is too error prone and has cost us massive amounts of points. He was exposed at the Euros he is just one of the best England has he is not even in the top 10 great keepers. Valdes is better than him and I been backing Hart from the start.
What are these massive amount of points you talk about ? Seriously I'm struggling to think and I'm not trying to argue
What I do know is many times we would have gone out of a lot of cup comps earlier and 2nd legs would be over if it wasn't for Hart
De-Gea is a wonderful keeper there is no doubt but he was at fault for liverpools goal in Europa league, West Ham equaliser in FA cup and stayed rooted to his line late last season for Leicester equaliser which cost them 4th. He also spilled a fairly tame free kick for Spain v Italy and I know he also made great saves that day but I've seen more than enough of Joe to know he is capable of those same saves.
Not 1 player for England produced their club form in the Euros, if it's the pressure and fear of making a mistake like Gerrard said yesterday I don't know but why should Hart be the one who really gets taken to task about it ?
Speak to a lot of Blues 50 and over and they will put Hart as top 2 or 3 keepers we've had, when I start wanting us to replace someone in that bracket I'll take a good look at myself