Then that raises the question of him. She didn't have the power, he did. His decision. If he allows his wife to talk him out of it then I still blame him.
What was her rationale? What were the reasons she gave not to? I cannot see it as just an act of evil to let people die.
There must have been a geopolitical set of rationales she invoked . What were they? That it turned out terrible needs to take a place in the endless line of tragic balls ups that happened because politicians look at the world and call it wrong.
The situation with the Clintons under that logic is me killing my neighbour after my wife telling me to then blaming her and in doing so trying to exonerate myself from it.
She may have been an accessory but Bill took the final decision and the responsibility for doing so, after all advice is considered as it would be mine if I topped my neighbour.
I've been warned by a mod to not continue to discuss the Clinton history as its taking the topic away from Trump so I won't continue to talk about it. You should be able to easily find more out via Google mate but in short she had a healthcare programme coming out and didn't want US intervention in the Balkans to take the news away from that, it's really that unbelievably selfish.
That's the last I'm saying I'm afraid as I have been warned.