There are plenty who want him to fail,this was evidenced prior to his arrival when the insults and vitriol aimed at him were off the scale.Many of those same people have carried that into this thread and on the edge of their seats waiting for a showing like the first 45 mins last night.
The only issue with Grealish is the price tag,he has offered and delivered plenty in his time here,goals and assists aren't the only factors......had he cost 40m the majority would not bat an eye lid.
Was he any less effective than Mahrez last night? Has his thread jumped enormously overnight?
Just don't think this is true. I certainly never aimed any vitriol at him after he signed and didn't see any from anyone else - why would we be having a go before he kicked a ball? I did start to criticise him after we were most of the way through his first season and he'd barely done anything.
You're right that we'd be less critical if he had cost £40m. But he didn't, so I hardly see how that's relevant.
He was more effective than Mahrez. The difference is that there's nobody other than Algerians still pretending Mahrez is good enough. Everyone agrees that he needs to be moved on ASAP, so there's little point discussing it on his thread.
And lastly, I'm going to echo what another poster said about how your repeated criticism of Sterling, who offered infinitely more than Jack, massively invalidates your sudden desire to give Grealish time now.