I am not sure which match you were watching but the one I was watching, Tottenham had 37% possession in the first half. When Grealish came in, Tottenham had 54% possession. We lost possession 16 times in the first half. We lost possession 36 times in the second half with Grealish on. So the control you think you saw, is all in your head. Our attack even dropped by 55% in the second half.We had better ball control since he came on and scored what was supposed to be the winner..
Not true, second half we were shocking, simply not in it.We had better ball control since he came on and scored what was supposed to be the winner..
Huff and puff, then check out opta:We had better ball control since he came on and scored what was supposed to be the winner..
We had better ball control since he came on and scored what was supposed to be the winner..
YES REALLY!Oh Really? Judging by the match thread. It was totally different!
We had better ball control since he came on and scored what was supposed to be the winner..
I think you are misunderstanding. I am not saying he isn’t good enough. I’m saying his output isn’t good enough considering his position as a wide attacker. He has 1 goal in 27 games. I totally get he brings something other than that, but the bottom line is we need forwards to contribute to goals.Wow just wow, is there a what a load of bollocks button on here