Odegaard like David Silva, Bernie and KDB can play anywhere in the midfield role, Phil can't. In terms of being a midfielder technicality not goals is what counts. I think things like playstation Fifa ratings might have contributed to this madness of labelling a player as the best technically. In reality it's totally different.I've already mentioned what technique actually is and never said a thing about either of those things.
To say that Odegaard is better technically than Foden is borderline ridiculous. I mean, are you Norwegian? That would at least explain such a mental take.
Are you a psychiatrist or an ignorant buffoon?Don't think it needed confirming to be fair.
Odegaard like David Silva, Bernie and KDB can play anywhere in the midfield role, Phil can't. In terms of being a midfielder technicality not goals is what counts. I think things like playstation Fifa ratings might have contributed to this madness of labelling a player as the best technically. In reality it's totally different.
Are you a psychiatrist or an ignorant buffoon?
You're a tilerYou decide
Rambling? Ok, more rambling coming in.I'm lost. I have no idea really what you're rambling about. Technique is first touch. How you move with a football. Your control. Odegaard is a great player no doubt but he doesn't do any of those things better than Foden in any shape or form.