9 | Erling Haaland - 2022/23 Performances

Status
Not open for further replies.
Having a debate with a rag/dipper on fb about Haaland's transfer fee. Is the 34m agents fee, and 40m paid to Alfie true? He calls all City fans deluded for thinking we only paid the 51m for him
 
Having a debate with a rag/dipper on fb about Haaland's transfer fee. Is the 34m agents fee, and 40m paid to Alfie true? He calls all City fans deluded for thinking we only paid the 51m for him

There certainly were agent fees and fees to Haaland & his Dad. But no one knows the figures. And I’m pretty sure some clueless Dippers or Rags on tinternet know the figures.
 
JIM WHITE ON TALKSHITE COMPARED HAALAND TO DUNCAN FERGUSON TODAY..

Had to type that in capitals for people to see it and realise it’s not a joke.

Ffs Ferguson’s best ever goal return in a Premier League season was 11.
The big man will have beaten that by the end of September.
The resemblance is uncanny!!
 
JIM WHITE ON TALKSHITE COMPARED HAALAND TO DUNCAN FERGUSON TODAY..

Had to type that in capitals for people to see it and realise it’s not a joke.
Big Dunc is probably better known for twatting burglars than anything he did in his football career.

That's not to say he wasn't a great old style number 9
 
There certainly were agent fees and fees to Haaland & his Dad. But no one knows the figures. And I’m pretty sure some clueless Dippers or Rags on tinternet know the figures.
Yeah, 43m to his agent and 40m to Alfie. He knows all the finances, the utter tit
 
Having a debate with a rag/dipper on fb about Haaland's transfer fee. Is the 34m agents fee, and 40m paid to Alfie true? He calls all City fans deluded for thinking we only paid the 51m for him
the actual amount isnt fully known but people who know things have said it was around 17 million to each party so 34 million in total
 
Having a debate with a rag/dipper on fb about Haaland's transfer fee. Is the 34m agents fee, and 40m paid to Alfie true? He calls all City fans deluded for thinking we only paid the 51m for him
Why would you waste your time and energy in arguing with a rag/dipper? Their deludedness knows no bounds and any logical points would likely go right over their head. He's worth every penny even if actual amount is 100M
 
Having a debate with a rag/dipper on fb about Haaland's transfer fee. Is the 34m agents fee, and 40m paid to Alfie true? He calls all City fans deluded for thinking we only paid the 51m for him
Nobody has a clue what his agent fees were, all figures are complete guesswork and plucked from thin air. social media proves that if you say something enough and get enough backing, it becomes true in the eyes of the masses of idiots.

Ask yourself why would Haaland, his agent or the club, the only people who would know that personal private financial information, leak it? There's obviously agent fees involved just as there is for every other player that has an agent. Why would you include an agents fee figure you don't know in a transfer yet ignore it for every single other transfer ever mentioned? Does he think Casemiro's agent didn't make a killing off his £70 million transfer to United? We paid a £51 million transfer fee.
 
If he keeps on scoring for us and carries on making headlines my worry is that some **** will try and damage him in a bad way.
Already mentioned in the Telegraph tonight how rival managers are getting their heads together on how to stop Erling. Sounds ominous but equally sounds like it could be bs
Of course it's bullshit. Don't worry about Erling he can handle himself on and off the pitch
 
Must admit to a crime of reviewing from time to time other clubs forums, but in my world for good purpose – to confront views, check out various arguments. At the end RAWK particularly looks sometimes very awkward, there are posters, who genuinely thinks Darwin>Haaland, and those evaluations have been made even today.

All right, let assume his red card didnt happen or even skip facts from so far PL campaign in pursuit for good discussion, but still its astonishing given historical achievements of both. And yes, then You take a peek at their games this season and it shall be apparently clear there is not only difference in strength and pace ability, but also how Haaland is noticeably more comfortable with ball.

As it isn’t wise to kick a man while he’s down, it would be premature to underline the difference in mental aspects during the games as well

Darwin Nunez may become a great player, but at the moment there is literally no single factor to ground the claim, that he is or will be better than Haaland.
 
I've often heard Pep say how much he admires players who can play without the ball and in Haaland we can see the classic example of the player he is talking about. The media try to twist the statistics to suggest that £300 million (!!!) is a ridiculous fee for someone who manages 8 touches per half on a good day but miss the point that Erling Haaland plays with his brains to a degree which is scarcely credible. Against Newcastle we saw him react more quickly than anyone else to score and then draw the CD out of the box to create the hole for KdB's beautiful pass for the equaliser, and against Palace he saw the space in a crowded penalty area a yard before any defender to take advantage of Stones's "pass" and Phil's lovely cross. Then his pace created the space for Gundo to play a through ball to set up the hat-trick - speed of thought as much as off the mark. Eight touches, 3 goals - that's some return from a fantastic player
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top