Arsenal Thread 2013/14

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bitter little cock snot from Goonersweb said:
City is a once distinguished now despicable club that has been hijacked by arabs who stole a fortune based on some archaic notion they have a God given right to gather the resources of a nation into their own hands. They have tried to use the proceeds of their immoral activities to buy some sort of respectability in the UK, via ownership of what was once a football club. Because the FA is staffed by weak, greedy and incompetent cowards these arabs have achieved their goals, technically speaking, though surely nobody is really fooled?

Even with the obscene amounts of money they have ploughed into the attempted purchase of titles and trophies they have come up laughably short, beaten by a mediocre Man Utd last season and headed by an Arsenal in transition this year, not to mention a series of humiliations in the Champions League. It really is comedy stuff, like a heavyweight constantly being knocked out by a featherweight - you'd laugh your arse off if that happened but because there so much money in the equation people barely mention just how poorly they have performed comparatively.

Now they have ploughed hundreds of millions more into their efforts and by trail and error have eventually managed to staff almost every place in the squad with high fee/ high salary mercenaries to the extent they are virtually immune from the effects of injuries, suspensions and general fatigue.

If this is achievement of any kind then why not find the next boy scout selling lemonade, whip out your wallet and set up a bigger stand and put the kid out of business then gloat about it? See how it feels to be al-manchester city. Of course some people admire them for this, hard to know why but they do.

As for Arsenal, as much as we have all hated it, they run the club as a proper business. There is absolutely no comparison between the two in terms of business practices and the spirit of the game in general. The arabs are trying to buy what we already have, but they'll find their money can't buy everything.

I can taste your tears, they are bitter and salty but nothing ever tasted better.
 
stony said:
Bitter little cock snot from Goonersweb said:
City is a once distinguished now despicable club that has been hijacked by arabs who stole a fortune based on some archaic notion they have a God given right to gather the resources of a nation into their own hands. They have tried to use the proceeds of their immoral activities to buy some sort of respectability in the UK, via ownership of what was once a football club. Because the FA is staffed by weak, greedy and incompetent cowards these arabs have achieved their goals, technically speaking, though surely nobody is really fooled?

Even with the obscene amounts of money they have ploughed into the attempted purchase of titles and trophies they have come up laughably short, beaten by a mediocre Man Utd last season and headed by an Arsenal in transition this year, not to mention a series of humiliations in the Champions League. It really is comedy stuff, like a heavyweight constantly being knocked out by a featherweight - you'd laugh your arse off if that happened but because there so much money in the equation people barely mention just how poorly they have performed comparatively.

Now they have ploughed hundreds of millions more into their efforts and by trail and error have eventually managed to staff almost every place in the squad with high fee/ high salary mercenaries to the extent they are virtually immune from the effects of injuries, suspensions and general fatigue.

If this is achievement of any kind then why not find the next boy scout selling lemonade, whip out your wallet and set up a bigger stand and put the kid out of business then gloat about it? See how it feels to be al-manchester city. Of course some people admire them for this, hard to know why but they do.

As for Arsenal, as much as we have all hated it, they run the club as a proper business. There is absolutely no comparison between the two in terms of business practices and the spirit of the game in general. The arabs are trying to buy what we already have, but they'll find their money can't buy everything.

I can taste your tears, they are bitter and salty but nothing ever tasted better.

Bwahahah you what?! The only team of last seasons top 4 clubs to keep their manager (who's been in situ longer than any other manager in the league by eons now Slur has retired), assimilating a grand total of ONE major signing into the first team.

If that's being in transition then we've practically started a new club from scratch!

Love how he signs it off swallowing the company script hook line and sinker too. Must be a riot down at a tarquin local.. "Yeah but never mind the time Aguero won the league for City with the last kick of the game, what about that time we did business the right way? Fucking edge of the seat stuff that was, stays with you for a lifetime.."
 
adrianr said:
stony said:
Bitter little cock snot from Goonersweb said:
City is a once distinguished now despicable club that has been hijacked by arabs who stole a fortune based on some archaic notion they have a God given right to gather the resources of a nation into their own hands. They have tried to use the proceeds of their immoral activities to buy some sort of respectability in the UK, via ownership of what was once a football club. Because the FA is staffed by weak, greedy and incompetent cowards these arabs have achieved their goals, technically speaking, though surely nobody is really fooled?

Even with the obscene amounts of money they have ploughed into the attempted purchase of titles and trophies they have come up laughably short, beaten by a mediocre Man Utd last season and headed by an Arsenal in transition this year, not to mention a series of humiliations in the Champions League. It really is comedy stuff, like a heavyweight constantly being knocked out by a featherweight - you'd laugh your arse off if that happened but because there so much money in the equation people barely mention just how poorly they have performed comparatively.

Now they have ploughed hundreds of millions more into their efforts and by trail and error have eventually managed to staff almost every place in the squad with high fee/ high salary mercenaries to the extent they are virtually immune from the effects of injuries, suspensions and general fatigue.

If this is achievement of any kind then why not find the next boy scout selling lemonade, whip out your wallet and set up a bigger stand and put the kid out of business then gloat about it? See how it feels to be al-manchester city. Of course some people admire them for this, hard to know why but they do.

As for Arsenal, as much as we have all hated it, they run the club as a proper business. There is absolutely no comparison between the two in terms of business practices and the spirit of the game in general. The arabs are trying to buy what we already have, but they'll find their money can't buy everything.

I can taste your tears, they are bitter and salty but nothing ever tasted better.

Bwahahah you what?! The only team of last seasons top 4 clubs to keep their manager (who's been in situ longer than any other manager in the league by eons now Slur has retired), assimilating a grand total of ONE major signing into the first team.

If that's being in transition then we've practically started a new club from scratch!

Love how he signs it off swallowing the company script hook line and sinker too. Must be a riot down at a tarquin local.. "Yeah but never mind the time Aguero won the league for City with the last kick of the game, what about that time we did business the right way? Fucking edge of the seat stuff that was, stays with you for a lifetime.."
His user name is very apt:)
 
andyhinch said:
adrianr said:
stony said:
I can taste your tears, they are bitter and salty but nothing ever tasted better.

Bwahahah you what?! The only team of last seasons top 4 clubs to keep their manager (who's been in situ longer than any other manager in the league by eons now Slur has retired), assimilating a grand total of ONE major signing into the first team.

If that's being in transition then we've practically started a new club from scratch!

Love how he signs it off swallowing the company script hook line and sinker too. Must be a riot down at a tarquin local.. "Yeah but never mind the time Aguero won the league for City with the last kick of the game, what about that time we did business the right way? Fucking edge of the seat stuff that was, stays with you for a lifetime.."
His user name is very apt:)
I think stony might have taken some artistic licence there.
 
stony said:
Bitter little cock snot from Goonersweb said:
City is a once distinguished now despicable club that has been hijacked by arabs who stole a fortune based on some archaic notion they have a God given right to gather the resources of a nation into their own hands. They have tried to use the proceeds of their immoral activities to buy some sort of respectability in the UK, via ownership of what was once a football club. Because the FA is staffed by weak, greedy and incompetent cowards these arabs have achieved their goals, technically speaking, though surely nobody is really fooled?

Even with the obscene amounts of money they have ploughed into the attempted purchase of titles and trophies they have come up laughably short, beaten by a mediocre Man Utd last season and headed by an Arsenal in transition this year, not to mention a series of humiliations in the Champions League. It really is comedy stuff, like a heavyweight constantly being knocked out by a featherweight - you'd laugh your arse off if that happened but because there so much money in the equation people barely mention just how poorly they have performed comparatively.

Now they have ploughed hundreds of millions more into their efforts and by trail and error have eventually managed to staff almost every place in the squad with high fee/ high salary mercenaries to the extent they are virtually immune from the effects of injuries, suspensions and general fatigue.

If this is achievement of any kind then why not find the next boy scout selling lemonade, whip out your wallet and set up a bigger stand and put the kid out of business then gloat about it? See how it feels to be al-manchester city. Of course some people admire them for this, hard to know why but they do.

As for Arsenal, as much as we have all hated it, they run the club as a proper business. There is absolutely no comparison between the two in terms of business practices and the spirit of the game in general. The arabs are trying to buy what we already have, but they'll find their money can't buy everything.

I can taste your tears, they are bitter and salty but nothing ever tasted better.

Quite xenophobic too. Too bad that he's a gunner but I guess all clubs have some proportion of unsavories supporting them?
 
Ronuja said:
stony said:
Bitter little cock snot from Goonersweb said:
City is a once distinguished now despicable club that has been hijacked by arabs who stole a fortune based on some archaic notion they have a God given right to gather the resources of a nation into their own hands. They have tried to use the proceeds of their immoral activities to buy some sort of respectability in the UK, via ownership of what was once a football club. Because the FA is staffed by weak, greedy and incompetent cowards these arabs have achieved their goals, technically speaking, though surely nobody is really fooled?

Even with the obscene amounts of money they have ploughed into the attempted purchase of titles and trophies they have come up laughably short, beaten by a mediocre Man Utd last season and headed by an Arsenal in transition this year, not to mention a series of humiliations in the Champions League. It really is comedy stuff, like a heavyweight constantly being knocked out by a featherweight - you'd laugh your arse off if that happened but because there so much money in the equation people barely mention just how poorly they have performed comparatively.

Now they have ploughed hundreds of millions more into their efforts and by trail and error have eventually managed to staff almost every place in the squad with high fee/ high salary mercenaries to the extent they are virtually immune from the effects of injuries, suspensions and general fatigue.

If this is achievement of any kind then why not find the next boy scout selling lemonade, whip out your wallet and set up a bigger stand and put the kid out of business then gloat about it? See how it feels to be al-manchester city. Of course some people admire them for this, hard to know why but they do.

As for Arsenal, as much as we have all hated it, they run the club as a proper business. There is absolutely no comparison between the two in terms of business practices and the spirit of the game in general. The arabs are trying to buy what we already have, but they'll find their money can't buy everything.

I can taste your tears, they are bitter and salty but nothing ever tasted better.

Quite xenophobic too. Too bad that he's a gunner but I guess all clubs have some proportion of unsavories supporting them?

Is he a TH fan
 
stony said:
Bitter little cock snot from Goonersweb said:
City is a once distinguished now despicable club that has been hijacked by arabs who stole a fortune based on some archaic notion they have a God given right to gather the resources of a nation into their own hands. They have tried to use the proceeds of their immoral activities to buy some sort of respectability in the UK, via ownership of what was once a football club. Because the FA is staffed by weak, greedy and incompetent cowards these arabs have achieved their goals, technically speaking, though surely nobody is really fooled?

Even with the obscene amounts of money they have ploughed into the attempted purchase of titles and trophies they have come up laughably short, beaten by a mediocre Man Utd last season and headed by an Arsenal in transition this year, not to mention a series of humiliations in the Champions League. It really is comedy stuff, like a heavyweight constantly being knocked out by a featherweight - you'd laugh your arse off if that happened but because there so much money in the equation people barely mention just how poorly they have performed comparatively.

Now they have ploughed hundreds of millions more into their efforts and by trail and error have eventually managed to staff almost every place in the squad with high fee/ high salary mercenaries to the extent they are virtually immune from the effects of injuries, suspensions and general fatigue.

If this is achievement of any kind then why not find the next boy scout selling lemonade, whip out your wallet and set up a bigger stand and put the kid out of business then gloat about it? See how it feels to be al-manchester city. Of course some people admire them for this, hard to know why but they do.

As for Arsenal, as much as we have all hated it, they run the club as a proper business. There is absolutely no comparison between the two in terms of business practices and the spirit of the game in general. The arabs are trying to buy what we already have, but they'll find their money can't buy everything.

I can taste your tears, they are bitter and salty but nothing ever tasted better.
Did he write that after the SIX THREE or before I wonder :-)
 
stony said:
Bitter little cock snot from Goonersweb said:
City is a once distinguished now despicable club that has been hijacked by arabs who stole a fortune based on some archaic notion they have a God given right to gather the resources of a nation into their own hands.
As opposed to being owned by a man who married into one of the richest families in the USA and another who is Russia's richest man via a fortune I'm sure he made entirely from the sweat of his brow and that didn't involve any criminality or cronyism at all.

http://alisherusmanov.blogspot.co.uk/
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
andyhinch said:
adrianr said:
Bwahahah you what?! The only team of last seasons top 4 clubs to keep their manager (who's been in situ longer than any other manager in the league by eons now Slur has retired), assimilating a grand total of ONE major signing into the first team.

If that's being in transition then we've practically started a new club from scratch!

Love how he signs it off swallowing the company script hook line and sinker too. Must be a riot down at a tarquin local.. "Yeah but never mind the time Aguero won the league for City with the last kick of the game, what about that time we did business the right way? Fucking edge of the seat stuff that was, stays with you for a lifetime.."
His user name is very apt:)
I think stony might have taken some artistic licence there.
Had me fooled:)
 
more lazy than useless said:
Gillespie said:
I am no apologist for Arsenal. My point was about facts, not opinion.

You ignore my words and rant against things I haven't said. Am I to be the focus of your seeming anti-Arsenal bile?

If we are to debate we must stick to the facts and have the discipline to argue against the written word and not be so sensitive to criticism thats one sees slights where none are intended.

In other words, leave prejudice and irrationality to one side.

Fact: City have the resources unmatched by any with the possible exception of Chelsea. There's nothing wrong with that. There is no superior model, as you put it. The rules allow the current situation. Success is fleeting, so enjoy the moment.

Unless you're an android, there is surely a place for emotion in sport or what's the point?

I don't think his comments were aimed at you (but I don't want to speak for him) and you may have missed the point.

It is yet another bitter jibe by a man who has decided what is right and what is wrong, and that was what the reply seemed to be about. I think the inclusion of your post was just for context.

I would also disagree that our resources are 'unmatched', there is more than one way to skin a cat. I'm not saying that (theoretically) we don't have more money available than them, but there's far more to it than that. For example, Arsenal chose to spend their money on a new stadium (a good business decision, and a correct one if you ask me). They have also benefited enormously from being at the top of the table at the right time, when the money started rolling in etc. Also, they wanted a business like approach (to increase profit) even though it clearly advantaged themselves over other clubs, and now somebody has come along with a better business model Wenger whinges at every opportunity but can't see the irony that they deliberately tried to skew the system in their favour.

Football isn't the only thing to get discussed on here, whinging hypocrite Wenger is certainly a reasonable topic. And especially when he takes a sly swipe at our club.

Yes, I agree. There is room for emotion or passion in sport. That's the point of it - the beautiful game providing occasional moments of joy interspersed with moments of gloom.

I did say I wasn't an apologist for Arsenal or Arsene for that matter. I merely pointed out the fact that Arsenal couldn't compete in the money stakes with City. That's a fact. Of course, Arsenal therefore of necessity have a different financial model to City.

However, I did take exception to bluemoon's rant because it was irrational attributing views to me that I hadn't stated and as it turns out, he was decent enough to explain his rant last night was after a few beers. I don't mind that. I've been pissed and ranted off myself in the past which is what happens on web fans forums.

Anyway, can I repeat that I don't have a problem with City's model. Those who suggest that Arsenal, because of their different business model are somehow morally superior are talking bollox. We are not debating moral philosophy here and I don't see moralising as an appropriate form of comparison when looking at the way football clubs are run.

As long as clubs comply with the regulatory rules, then it's fine. I have a much bigger problem with the cynical owners that run good clubs into the ground ( Glasgow Rangers, Hearts and Portsmouth to name but 3).

As for Aguero's last minute winner against QPR that won you the title, most Arsenal fans I know cheered that moment and we all revelled in Man Yoos discomfort and humiliation at the hands of Sunderland fans.

Again, most Arsenal fans I know don't really have a big problem with City. If anything, welcoming your success after Man Yoos years of domination and seeing it as a deserved reward for the patience and loyalty of previously long suffering fans.

Looking forward, I do think that FFP will mean clubs business models will become similar and more self sustaining. Those who make the point that FFP is likely to make it more difficult to dine at the top table make a valid point but I'm not wise enough to work out how we can change that.

Anyway, a great season so far. I do think its between you and Chelsea, though I suspect going forward, Arsenal's greater financial muscle (as demonstrated by the Ozil purchase) should mean they can compete better than before when having to finance the new stadium.

If its not Arsenal, then let it be City or Liverpool this season. I wouldn't care to see Chelsea or God forbid, Man Yoo again, though in the latter case, I think they have shot their bolt for this season.

And a Happy New Year to you all! Even bluemoon115! ;^)
 
Gillespie said:
more lazy than useless said:
Gillespie said:
I am no apologist for Arsenal. My point was about facts, not opinion.

You ignore my words and rant against things I haven't said. Am I to be the focus of your seeming anti-Arsenal bile?

If we are to debate we must stick to the facts and have the discipline to argue against the written word and not be so sensitive to criticism thats one sees slights where none are intended.

In other words, leave prejudice and irrationality to one side.

Fact: City have the resources unmatched by any with the possible exception of Chelsea. There's nothing wrong with that. There is no superior model, as you put it. The rules allow the current situation. Success is fleeting, so enjoy the moment.

Unless you're an android, there is surely a place for emotion in sport or what's the point?

I don't think his comments were aimed at you (but I don't want to speak for him) and you may have missed the point.

It is yet another bitter jibe by a man who has decided what is right and what is wrong, and that was what the reply seemed to be about. I think the inclusion of your post was just for context.

I would also disagree that our resources are 'unmatched', there is more than one way to skin a cat. I'm not saying that (theoretically) we don't have more money available than them, but there's far more to it than that. For example, Arsenal chose to spend their money on a new stadium (a good business decision, and a correct one if you ask me). They have also benefited enormously from being at the top of the table at the right time, when the money started rolling in etc. Also, they wanted a business like approach (to increase profit) even though it clearly advantaged themselves over other clubs, and now somebody has come along with a better business model Wenger whinges at every opportunity but can't see the irony that they deliberately tried to skew the system in their favour.

Football isn't the only thing to get discussed on here, whinging hypocrite Wenger is certainly a reasonable topic. And especially when he takes a sly swipe at our club.

Yes, I agree. There is room for emotion or passion in sport. That's the point of it - the beautiful game providing occasional moments of joy interspersed with moments of gloom.

I did say I wasn't an apologist for Arsenal or Arsene for that matter. I merely pointed out the fact that Arsenal couldn't compete in the money stakes with City. That's a fact. Of course, Arsenal therefore of necessity have a different financial model to City.

However, I did take exception to bluemoon's rant because it was irrational attributing views to me that I hadn't stated and as it turns out, he was decent enough to explain his rant last night was after a few beers. I don't mind that. I've been pissed and ranted off myself in the past which is what happens on web fans forums.

Anyway, can I repeat that I don't have a problem with City's model. Those who suggest that Arsenal, because of their different business model are somehow morally superior are talking bollox. We are not debating moral philosophy here and I don't see moralising as an appropriate form of comparison when looking at the way football clubs are run.

As long as clubs comply with the regulatory rules, then it's fine. I have a much bigger problem with the cynical owners that run good clubs into the ground ( Glasgow Rangers, Hearts and Portsmouth to name but 3).

As for Aguero's last minute winner against QPR that won you the title, most Arsenal fans I know cheered that moment and we all revelled in Man Yoos discomfort and humiliation at the hands of Sunderland fans.

Again, most Arsenal fans I know don't really have a big problem with City. If anything, welcoming your success after Man Yoos years of domination and seeing it as a deserved reward for the patience and loyalty of previously long suffering fans.

Looking forward, I do think that FFP will mean clubs business models will become similar and more self sustaining. Those who make the point that FFP is likely to make it more difficult to dine at the top table make a valid point but I'm not wise enough to work out how we can change that.

Anyway, a great season so far. I do think its between you and Chelsea, though I suspect going forward, Arsenal's greater financial muscle (as demonstrated by the Ozil purchase) should mean they can compete better than before when having to finance the new stadium.

If its not Arsenal, then let it be City or Liverpool this season. I wouldn't care to see Chelsea or God forbid, Man Yoo again, though in the latter case, I think they have shot their bolt for this season.

And a Happy New Year to you all! Even bluemoon115! ;^)

X rag now arse
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Another thick said:
Article on evil Arabs and Citeh by N_Q:

Erm - do they not realise whose name is on their shirt and their stadium?
Their stupidity hurts. Most bitter fans in the world. How can a club that charges those ticket prices claim they are "run properly". Laughable!<br /><br />-- Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:37 pm --<br /><br />
stony said:

I can taste your tears, they are bitter and salty but nothing ever tasted better.
haha this had me laughing for a while :)
 
spanishblue said:
Gillespie said:
more lazy than useless said:
Unless you're an android, there is surely a place for emotion in sport or what's the point?

I don't think his comments were aimed at you (but I don't want to speak for him) and you may have missed the point.

It is yet another bitter jibe by a man who has decided what is right and what is wrong, and that was what the reply seemed to be about. I think the inclusion of your post was just for context.

I would also disagree that our resources are 'unmatched', there is more than one way to skin a cat. I'm not saying that (theoretically) we don't have more money available than them, but there's far more to it than that. For example, Arsenal chose to spend their money on a new stadium (a good business decision, and a correct one if you ask me). They have also benefited enormously from being at the top of the table at the right time, when the money started rolling in etc. Also, they wanted a business like approach (to increase profit) even though it clearly advantaged themselves over other clubs, and now somebody has come along with a better business model Wenger whinges at every opportunity but can't see the irony that they deliberately tried to skew the system in their favour.

Football isn't the only thing to get discussed on here, whinging hypocrite Wenger is certainly a reasonable topic. And especially when he takes a sly swipe at our club.

Yes, I agree. There is room for emotion or passion in sport. That's the point of it - the beautiful game providing occasional moments of joy interspersed with moments of gloom.

I did say I wasn't an apologist for Arsenal or Arsene for that matter. I merely pointed out the fact that Arsenal couldn't compete in the money stakes with City. That's a fact. Of course, Arsenal therefore of necessity have a different financial model to City.

However, I did take exception to bluemoon's rant because it was irrational attributing views to me that I hadn't stated and as it turns out, he was decent enough to explain his rant last night was after a few beers. I don't mind that. I've been pissed and ranted off myself in the past which is what happens on web fans forums.

Anyway, can I repeat that I don't have a problem with City's model. Those who suggest that Arsenal, because of their different business model are somehow morally superior are talking bollox. We are not debating moral philosophy here and I don't see moralising as an appropriate form of comparison when looking at the way football clubs are run.

As long as clubs comply with the regulatory rules, then it's fine. I have a much bigger problem with the cynical owners that run good clubs into the ground ( Glasgow Rangers, Hearts and Portsmouth to name but 3).

As for Aguero's last minute winner against QPR that won you the title, most Arsenal fans I know cheered that moment and we all revelled in Man Yoos discomfort and humiliation at the hands of Sunderland fans.

Again, most Arsenal fans I know don't really have a big problem with City. If anything, welcoming your success after Man Yoos years of domination and seeing it as a deserved reward for the patience and loyalty of previously long suffering fans.

Looking forward, I do think that FFP will mean clubs business models will become similar and more self sustaining. Those who make the point that FFP is likely to make it more difficult to dine at the top table make a valid point but I'm not wise enough to work out how we can change that.

Anyway, a great season so far. I do think its between you and Chelsea, though I suspect going forward, Arsenal's greater financial muscle (as demonstrated by the Ozil purchase) should mean they can compete better than before when having to finance the new stadium.

If its not Arsenal, then let it be City or Liverpool this season. I wouldn't care to see Chelsea or God forbid, Man Yoo again, though in the latter case, I think they have shot their bolt for this season.

And a Happy New Year to you all! Even bluemoon115! ;^)

X rag now arse

Never clever now confirmed
 
I wouldn't lose sleep about us winning the league.

Sitting on top the league in January and instead of strengthening properly, we are now going to have to swallow the bitter f**king pill of no proper investment in the team.

Ozil was a mistake. Madrid snatched the money out of their hands before they realised what they'd agreed to.

Normal service is resumed.

We are going to settle for the joy that is f**king 4th place AGAIN.

Inter are bidding 13million euros for Morata and we are getting George N-f**kng- Tep a Ligue 2 striker, that's barely championship level.

http://news.arseblog.com/2014/01/french-press-ntep-to-arsenal-is-very-close/

For all I know he could be the next Henry but if he was he wouldn't still be in Ligue 2 at 22. More likely he's the next great sh*te hope to come out of Auxerre since Stephan Guivarch......remember how crap he was.
 
Ooft, not been on for a few days guys, not sure if its safe to make an appearance after reading the last few pages! :-)

Anyway, how are we all? Not much has changed, all 3 teams at the top getting the results they needed at the weekend, this will defo be tight at least until the tough double header in February Arsenal have against Utd and Liverpool.

I'm hoping for Utd to get a draw in this weekends game, but I highly doubt. Isn't it just like Chelsea to play Utd when they don't have Van Persie or Rooney. Could have done with them playing Hull after they signed Jelavic and Long as well.

Speaking of Chelsea, I'm sorry to admit to you guys that in my league winners swingometer, the pendulum has Chelsea as slight favourites at the moment. Some of you might like the fact that someone hasn't said its City's to lose or any other phrase that's been banded about recently. I just think looking at the remaining fixtures they could have the edge, Matic could give them a boost as well.

1 date stands out for me more than most though, its not the game for them at the Tihad, its not the game against us at Stamford Bridge, for me, Liverpool v Chelsea, 3rd last game of the season. Wouldn't it be ironic for a Chelsea team under Mourinho to 'lose' the league at Anfield?!!<br /><br />-- Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:17 pm --<br /><br />
The 49ers said:
I wouldn't lose sleep about us winning the league.

Sitting on top the league in January and instead of strengthening properly, we are now going to have to swallow the bitter f**king pill of no proper investment in the team.

Ozil was a mistake. Madrid snatched the money out of their hands before they realised what they'd agreed to.

Normal service is resumed.

We are going to settle for the joy that is f**king 4th place AGAIN.

Inter are bidding 13million euros for Morata and we are getting George N-f**kng- Tep a Ligue 2 striker, that's barely championship level.

http://news.arseblog.com/2014/01/french-press-ntep-to-arsenal-is-very-close/

For all I know he could be the next Henry but if he was he wouldn't still be in Ligue 2 at 22. More likely he's the next great sh*te hope to come out of Auxerre since Stephan Guivarch......remember how crap he was.

4th place.....you not think we might sneak 3rd?!
 
GunnerGer said:
Ooft, not been on for a few days guys, not sure if its safe to make an appearance after reading the last few pages! :-)

Anyway, how are we all? Not much has changed, all 3 teams at the top getting the results they needed at the weekend, this will defo be tight at least until the tough double header in February Arsenal have against Utd and Liverpool.

I'm hoping for Utd to get a draw in this weekends game, but I highly doubt. Isn't it just like Chelsea to play Utd when they don't have Van Persie or Rooney. Could have done with them playing Hull after they signed Jelavic and Long as well.

Speaking of Chelsea, I'm sorry to admit to you guys that in my league winners swingometer, the pendulum has Chelsea as slight favourites at the moment. Some of you might like the fact that someone hasn't said its City's to lose or any other phrase that's been banded about recently. I just think looking at the remaining fixtures they could have the edge, Matic could give them a boost as well.

1 date stands out for me more than most though, its not the game for them at the Tihad, its not the game against us at Stamford Bridge, for me, Liverpool v Chelsea, 3rd last game of the season. Wouldn't it be ironic for a Chelsea team under Mourinho to 'lose' the league at Anfield?!!

-- Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:17 pm --

The 49ers said:
I wouldn't lose sleep about us winning the league.

Sitting on top the league in January and instead of strengthening properly, we are now going to have to swallow the bitter f**king pill of no proper investment in the team.

Ozil was a mistake. Madrid snatched the money out of their hands before they realised what they'd agreed to.

Normal service is resumed.

We are going to settle for the joy that is f**king 4th place AGAIN.

Inter are bidding 13million euros for Morata and we are getting George N-f**kng- Tep a Ligue 2 striker, that's barely championship level.

http://news.arseblog.com/2014/01/french-press-ntep-to-arsenal-is-very-close/

For all I know he could be the next Henry but if he was he wouldn't still be in Ligue 2 at 22. More likely he's the next great sh*te hope to come out of Auxerre since Stephan Guivarch......remember how crap he was.

4th place.....you not think we might sneak 3rd?!




i dont know about you but i keep wondering who will blink first between you, us and them. everytime we beat a team you and chelsea are still there
 
r.soleofsalford said:
GunnerGer said:
Ooft, not been on for a few days guys, not sure if its safe to make an appearance after reading the last few pages! :-)

Anyway, how are we all? Not much has changed, all 3 teams at the top getting the results they needed at the weekend, this will defo be tight at least until the tough double header in February Arsenal have against Utd and Liverpool.

I'm hoping for Utd to get a draw in this weekends game, but I highly doubt. Isn't it just like Chelsea to play Utd when they don't have Van Persie or Rooney. Could have done with them playing Hull after they signed Jelavic and Long as well.

Speaking of Chelsea, I'm sorry to admit to you guys that in my league winners swingometer, the pendulum has Chelsea as slight favourites at the moment. Some of you might like the fact that someone hasn't said its City's to lose or any other phrase that's been banded about recently. I just think looking at the remaining fixtures they could have the edge, Matic could give them a boost as well.

1 date stands out for me more than most though, its not the game for them at the Tihad, its not the game against us at Stamford Bridge, for me, Liverpool v Chelsea, 3rd last game of the season. Wouldn't it be ironic for a Chelsea team under Mourinho to 'lose' the league at Anfield?!!

-- Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:17 pm --

The 49ers said:
I wouldn't lose sleep about us winning the league.

Sitting on top the league in January and instead of strengthening properly, we are now going to have to swallow the bitter f**king pill of no proper investment in the team.

Ozil was a mistake. Madrid snatched the money out of their hands before they realised what they'd agreed to.

Normal service is resumed.

We are going to settle for the joy that is f**king 4th place AGAIN.

Inter are bidding 13million euros for Morata and we are getting George N-f**kng- Tep a Ligue 2 striker, that's barely championship level.

http://news.arseblog.com/2014/01/french-press-ntep-to-arsenal-is-very-close/

For all I know he could be the next Henry but if he was he wouldn't still be in Ligue 2 at 22. More likely he's the next great sh*te hope to come out of Auxerre since Stephan Guivarch......remember how crap he was.

4th place.....you not think we might sneak 3rd?!




i dont know about you but i keep wondering who will blink first between you, us and them. everytime we beat a team you and chelsea are still there

Wait til March and your lot, Chelsea and possibly Pool will be able to see a cannon fading in your rear view mirror.

Now was the time to strengthen properly.

When you attack, you have Aguero,Negredo(16million...how ??!!),Silva,Toure. All pretty clinical in front of goal. Then you bench Dzeko and even Fernandinho bags a worldy now and then.

Chelsea only need to attack once or twice and then Maureen shuts the game down1-0,2-0 job done.

We defend well, have a decent midfeld, but Giroud needs help. We need a clinical striker. Also decent CB as back up for for Koscielny or the BFG get injured. Our squad as it is will not last the season without some back up. And no Ligue 2 strikers don't count.

I
 
The 49ers said:
r.soleofsalford said:
GunnerGer said:
Ooft, not been on for a few days guys, not sure if its safe to make an appearance after reading the last few pages! :-)

Anyway, how are we all? Not much has changed, all 3 teams at the top getting the results they needed at the weekend, this will defo be tight at least until the tough double header in February Arsenal have against Utd and Liverpool.

I'm hoping for Utd to get a draw in this weekends game, but I highly doubt. Isn't it just like Chelsea to play Utd when they don't have Van Persie or Rooney. Could have done with them playing Hull after they signed Jelavic and Long as well.

Speaking of Chelsea, I'm sorry to admit to you guys that in my league winners swingometer, the pendulum has Chelsea as slight favourites at the moment. Some of you might like the fact that someone hasn't said its City's to lose or any other phrase that's been banded about recently. I just think looking at the remaining fixtures they could have the edge, Matic could give them a boost as well.

1 date stands out for me more than most though, its not the game for them at the Tihad, its not the game against us at Stamford Bridge, for me, Liverpool v Chelsea, 3rd last game of the season. Wouldn't it be ironic for a Chelsea team under Mourinho to 'lose' the league at Anfield?!!

-- Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:17 pm --



4th place.....you not think we might sneak 3rd?!




i dont know about you but i keep wondering who will blink first between you, us and them. everytime we beat a team you and chelsea are still there

Wait til March and your lot, Chelsea and possibly Pool will be able to see a cannon fading in your rear view mirror.

Now was the time to strengthen properly.

When you attack, you have Aguero,Negredo(16million...how ??!!),Silva,Toure. All pretty clinical in front of goal. Then you bench Dzeko and even Fernandinho bags a worldy now and then.

Chelsea only need to attack once or twice and then Maureen shuts the game down1-0,2-0 job done.

We defend well, have a decent midfeld, but Giroud needs help. We need a clinical striker. Also decent CB as back up for for Koscielny or the BFG get injured. Our squad as it is will not last the season without some back up. And no Ligue 2 strikers don't count.

I

Think you're being a bit pessimistic there pal! Not training to be a City fan are you? ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top