Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 38,498
Very interesting that mate, cheers for the reply.
I wouldnt want Chelsea to have an Ultra's type group like Palace for example, a group like City have is the right way to go imo, we have a new shed end group starting up who have been working with the club for a while now mainly regarding flag displays, they have arranged some quality displays in recent years, though as we all know flags dont sing, supporters do, this new group i hope will be able to convince the club that standing/singing all game is how it should be, another problem we have is our stewards & security are total arseholes.
While i'm glad we're staying at the Bridge i cant help feel a bit disappointed with the design because we all hoped it'd be much much better with proper singing areas.
Regards atmosphere & the tiers helping drown out the away fans, dont you think that might hinder City fans for being more up for certain games?
As we know football is tribal & there's nothing better than seeing 1,500/3,000 or whatever away invaders up & singing & kicking home fans in to life, maybe if City fans cant hear away fans they wont be so keen to get up & sing? obviously i dont mean your new 1894 group but the sort of fans that sometimes need a kick up the arse to wake them up.
The Chelsea fans in the top tier numbered about 1500 and certainly helped with the atmosphere up there. To be honest you can't hear the lower tiers much up in tier 3 so songs are not likely to be sung by the full 3000. Last season, very few teams brought the full allocation to our place. Maybe you, Arsenal, utd, Liverpool, Everton and Southampton.