ladyoftheblues said:Typical FA i knew they would charge him.............BIg point is are they going to review the TWO FOOTED sliding challange parker did on micah?
But it was with excessive force and many refs would have given a yellow for that.quiet_riot said:ladyoftheblues said:Typical FA i knew they would charge him.............BIg point is are they going to review the TWO FOOTED sliding challange parker did on micah?
Probably not, seeing as it was a one-footed tackle that won the ball.
Marvin said:But it was with excessive force and many refs would have given a yellow for that.quiet_riot said:ladyoftheblues said:Typical FA i knew they would charge him.............BIg point is are they going to review the TWO FOOTED sliding challange parker did on micah?
Probably not, seeing as it was a one-footed tackle that won the ball.
The pointn is fair. Who decides what to review? In this case Harry chose. More usually its MOTD pundits
They rub their brain cell.beehive_bob said:Thought it was a stamp, but also thought he might get away with it due to inconclusive evidence as it looked quite different depending what angle you looked at it from. Think the decision is the right one.
How do the FA make their decisions? Is it a panel, and if so who sits on the panel? Do they consider it has to be "beyond all reasonable doubt"? As long as the FA aren't accountable to anyone and there's a lack of transparency in their decision-making process, we'll continue to have debates/outrage/paranoid thread-making.