Balotelli alleged "stamp" V Spurs

Re: Balotelli Stamp V Spurs

swinton blue said:
it was said on the radio that the incident wasnt in the refs report so he hasnt seen it so the fa can deal with it

If true the video of Webb clearly looking straight at Parker on the floor as Balotelli "stamps" (as suggested by Redknapp) will make interesting viewing on any disciplinary proceedings.
 
Re: Balotelli Stamp V Spurs

swinton blue said:
it was said on the radio that the incident wasnt in the refs report so he hasnt seen it so the fa can deal with it


I don't understand this... does this mean the ref has to report on every single tackle ? His report would be like 'war & peace'. Webb was stood right in front of it and saw everything and chose not to respond.... foul or not.
 
Re: Balotelli Stamp V Spurs

Conniethecow said:
mcb1207 said:
Wasn't deliberate. But he did screw up. I actually think he threw his leg out to catch Parker to take a dive. And if you watch the video through he did the dive anyway. No intent to injure, just to win a free kick. It's what he does, just back fired today.
Wat a load of bollox.... that was clearly a stamp I'm sure if I stamped on a work colleagues head I would be sacked.... conniethecow


Shut the f7ck up you cow. Football and office work are two separate things you dumb f7ck. If you played football at work im sure you'd get sacked for that so shut the f7ck up.

You're embarrassing your self cos you don't know what you're talking about. We got f7cked on the red card for Vinny and things even themselves, so go home and have wank about how much you hate city and have a cry while your at it. Daft ass.
 
Re: Balotelli Stamp V Spurs

This so called player needs to take up acting, I hear eastenders are looking for a prick
 
Re: Balotelli Stamp V Spurs

swinton blue said:
it was said on the radio that the incident wasnt in the refs report so he hasnt seen it so the fa can deal with it

Thats what I dont understand... Surely if its not in his report doesnt neccessarily mean he didnt see it,just that he deemed it un neccessary to write about ??

Surely the report should be for things worth reporting ??

And no...I didnt call you Surely...
 
Re: Balotelli Stamp V Spurs

Webb saw the incident and gave a free kick. Mario will be in the clear - unless the FA change the rules all of a sudden. FIFA have done this in the past (think playoffs which shafted Ireland) but i think he will be ok as Webb saw the incident.
 
Re: Balotelli Stamp V Spurs

CityBuzzin said:
glen quagmire said:
Hari84 said:
City fan or not .. this kick is done on purpose.
1417a86.jpg


No it's not... don't force your imaginary opinion.

Very interesting.......I think this will NOT be acted upon but the media will be going all out for a witch hunt no doubt.

I was there. I saw the incident. I have watched the video.

1) Webb saw it. You don't turn your head that way by accident. He followed the ball with his head but kept in his view the coming together and probably for reasons of player protection. (something he was keen on all game.)

2) The catalyst to the right foot backwards movement was the push in the back by Modric. Not an off balancing push but Balotelli will have felt the contact in his back as a continuing pressure/warning that the coming together is out of control and the momentum/loss of balance on Modrics part is now incharge of that situation. Moving back now to Balotelli - he has ground level contact on his left lower leg ( by Parkers Head). He ( Balo) is off balance himself and just received the hand warning in his back from Modric that potential impact is imminent. Balo is now in real danger of having his left leg caught where it is ( trapped against Parkers head ), falling cross the back of the head ,against the direction of Balo's fall with modrics then falling on top.....owch. Snapped leg time.I'd move my leg quickly under those circumstances as well. To remedy this Balo has to bring his left leg out of that situation immediately. He does this by thrusting it forward.To gain good leverage to then push way from the falling cavalcade of players , his right legs shoots back in what looks like a deliberate action. Well here lies the defence. It was a deliberate action but not to injure the player on the ground but to protect his own legs from being trapped in the fall. Now.......
The pressure in his back eases. Modric stops pushing. The player ( Modric) is not falling on to Balo who doesn't now have to dive headlong away from the "coming together". Instead he takes the quickest route to ground but carries on with a half hearted dive a little bit like a girl would.
Diving to the ground like a girl is not an offence unless he is trying to gain an advantage by cheating. He clearly wasn't.
You would never be able to prove that Balo intended to hurt Parker only that he intended to thrust his leg back.
3) No body appeals. Modric who is the closest to see the whole thing does not appeal like he has just witnessed an assault on a team member.
4) Modric himself becomes off balance and appears to plant a last stumbling foot in the very close vacinity of Parkers head. Any question that he was doing a sly Hartson on Berkovic - not on your nelly.
5) Was there even catagorical contact from the foot plant. Was a blood incident declared on the pitch whereby player leaves to have the wound seen to for the protection of others - not so sure that happened at all.
6) Would you trust the word of a man who receives £200,000 in an off shore bank account, fails to inform her majesty of said transaction and then doesn't think that's tax evasion.
 
Re: Balotelli Stamp V Spurs

ALL OUR LIVES said:
CityBuzzin said:


No it's not... don't force your imaginary opinion.

Very interesting.......I think this will NOT be acted upon but the media will be going all out for a witch hunt no doubt.

I was there. I saw the incident. I have watched the video.

1) Webb saw it. You don't turn your head that way by accident. He followed the ball with his head but kept in his view the coming together and probably for reasons of player protection. (something he was keen on all game.)

2) The catalyst to the right foot backwards movement was the push in the back by Modric. Not an off balancing push but Balotelli will have felt the contact in his back as a continuing pressure/warning that the coming together is out of control and the momentum/loss of balance on Modrics part is now incharge of that situation. Moving back now to Balotelli - he has ground level contact on his left lower leg ( by Parkers Head). He ( Balo) is off balance himself and just received the hand warning in his back from Modric that potential impact is imminent. Balo is now in real danger of having his left leg caught where it is ( trapped against Parkers head ), falling cross the back of the head ,against the direction of Balo's fall with modrics then falling on top.....owch. Snapped leg time.I'd move my leg quickly under those circumstances as well. To remedy this Balo has to bring his left leg out of that situation immediately. He does this by thrusting it forward.To gain good leverage to then push way from the falling cavalcade of players , his right legs shoots back in what looks like a deliberate action. Well here lies the defence. It was a deliberate action but not to injure the player on the ground but to protect his own legs from being trapped in the fall. Now.......
The pressure in his back eases. Modric stops pushing. The player ( Modric) is not falling on to Balo who doesn't now have to dive headlong away from the "coming together". Instead he takes the quickest route to ground but carries on with a half hearted dive a little bit like a girl would.
Diving to the ground like a girl is not an offence unless he is trying to gain an advantage by cheating. He clearly wasn't.
You would never be able to prove that Balo intended to hurt Parker only that he intended to thrust his leg back.
3) No body appeals. Modric who is the closest to see the whole thing does not appeal like he has just witnessed an assault on a team member.
4) Modric himself becomes off balance and appears to plant a last stumbling foot in the very close vacinity of Parkers head. Any question that he was doing a sly Hartson on Berkovic - not on your nelly.
5) Was there even catagorical contact from the foot plant. Was a blood incident declared on the pitch whereby player leaves to have the wound seen to for the protection of others - not so sure that happened at all.
6) Would you trust the word of a man who receives £200,000 in an off shore bank account, fails to inform her majesty of said transaction and then doesn't think that's tax evasion.
that seems a well balanced view in my book!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.