KenTheLandlord said:
Do you know that to be true? Or is Shay not hearing what he wants to hear and going tothe press anyway, to answer some questions?
He didn't "go to the press".
He did a full, detailed and frank double page interview with the Times.
He was pressed by the interviewer on his role and future at City and he said that noone had talked to him.
It's a concern to me as it is not in isolation.
-- Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:20 pm --
Nelly's Left Foot said:
What seems to have happened is that Given was told that he was going to be number 2 and Mancini, when asked about whether Shay would go or stay, said he would respect Shay's decision.
Shay at the time decided to stay and fight although in reality he would have know that meant sit on the bench until either Joe get's injured or drops some real clangers. In that decision I ASSUME that Shay was lead to expect he would get some game time either in euro games or the CC.
Along came the game v Salzburg and Joe was picked which I expect was quite a disappointment to Shay so soon after we get the story again about Shay going and the manager respecting whatever decision he comes to. Did Shay expect to play v Salzburg? We might never know but I doubt that Shay agreed to stay if he was lead to believe he wouldnt get any games at all.
As has been said Mancini is what he is in terms of his man management.It can create problems and might depend a lot on how successful we are on the field.Some of the so called problems ahve gone and maybe 1 or 2 more will have to go as well.Only time will tell.
Another fair post from you Nelly. AS someone who mainly talks sense, do you think it is possible to be like he is and be successful, given the nature of English football, the size of his squad and the pressure the club is under?