A
A
Anonymous
Guest
bluemoonmatt said:No he's not but he will be getting an excellent wedge for a GK, certainly well above average. I'm making it up now but at his age if he is on say £75K at city can you see a situation where Fulham for example will pay him that or on the flipside he would be prepared to go down to £40k. To be honest I can't even see an Arsenal of this world paying him the full amount we do. If he leaves it must be his choice so we aren't seen as a soft touch by either subsidising his wages at a new club or paying him off a la Stevie Ireland. Just my view.BillyShears said:I can see that being the case, although I'd be disappointed of Roberto did that. I think we need to leave Joe where he is irrespective of what mistakes he makes. He needs to feel that he owns that position.
With regard to Shay's wages/transfer fee - we bought him for 5.9 million, and he's certainly not on Adebayor wages by any stretch of the imagination. Personally I don't believe that his transfer fee or wages are or will be an issue if we choose to sell him. Well, having said that, I don't know what City value him at....but if it's around that figure I can't see it being a massively prohibitive...
I think you're making too much of this 'pay off' idea. As I said earlier in the thread, if you sign a player on a 4 year contract with big wages, then after 12 months effectively tell him that he's no longer needed, it stands to reason that if the player needs to move to get a game, as is the case with Given, that they will want the remainder of their contract paid up before they leave...it may not sit well with supporters, but even clubs accept that this needs to be done if you want the player gone. It's not new to City, and has been going on for years at all clubs, big and small...