Barry Conlons wig said:Lucky Toma said:George Hannah said:Lucky - the reason people think he's anti-City is because it is staggeringly obvious
Supported Everton as a kid, played for Liverpool then United. So obviously he hasnt got a great deal of love for us. But he drools over our play and players so I cant see any noticable bias.
Having said that his monotone commentary is abysmal and it baffles me why a major station trying to establish themselves as BT are have chosen him as their main man.
Lucky I suggest you record every owen commenting city game and go over it until you hear what everyone else does first time.... he is the worst and most biased anti city commentator I have ever heard, one bin dipping, horse spunk dribbling, gimp monkey
tonygt123 said:BT Owen
MUPPETS not paying 15 quid a month
argyle said:No, BT Sport aren't biased.
They asked questions of certain 'controversial' moments because that's what tv companies do - they need something to talk about and fill the time.
However, Owen is biased and I wouldn't be surprised if next season they use him as a studio pundit rather than commentator.
mat said:argyle said:No, BT Sport aren't biased.
They asked questions of certain 'controversial' moments because that's what tv companies do - they need something to talk about and fill the time.
However, Owen is biased and I wouldn't be surprised if next season they use him as a studio pundit rather than commentator.
Agree with this.
Iain Darke summarised after the whistle that city had been "electrifying".
The camera angles were piss poor, the usual edge of the box camera would show conclusively the spuds offside.
bluemike said:Poor coverage (no camera near the goal line)
Poor pundits, Owen is outstandingly shit
Glad I don't pay for it
Ducado said:bluemike said:Poor coverage (no camera near the goal line)
Poor pundits, Owen is outstandingly shit
Glad I don't pay for it
Same here based on what I have seen I won't be subscribing