Marklr
Well-Known Member
EVERY debate and argument should result in this statement: "MANCHESTER CITY FC DID NOT DISGUISE EQUITY FUNDING AS SPONSORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS BUT DID FAIL TO COOPERATE WITH THE UEFA AUTHORITIES"
That's all we need to know. CAS aren't gonna put that in bold letters at the top of the initial statement if it wasn't true. I believe it was an attempt to stop the rumours that we got off on a "technicality" or whatever bitter, jealous, desperate rival fans and biased sports journos will predictably claim.
"Oh....but the fine...you still did something wrong for there to be a fine"
I look at it like this: A man get's acquitted of some offence but still get's a fine for resisting arrest. Nothing to even debate there.
"MANCHESTER CITY FC DID NOT DISGUISE EQUITY FUNDING AS SPONSORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS "
That's all we need to know. CAS aren't gonna put that in bold letters at the top of the initial statement if it wasn't true. I believe it was an attempt to stop the rumours that we got off on a "technicality" or whatever bitter, jealous, desperate rival fans and biased sports journos will predictably claim.
"Oh....but the fine...you still did something wrong for there to be a fine"
I look at it like this: A man get's acquitted of some offence but still get's a fine for resisting arrest. Nothing to even debate there.
"MANCHESTER CITY FC DID NOT DISGUISE EQUITY FUNDING AS SPONSORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS "