You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)
- Thread starter jimharri
- Start date
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
And here you have point 2 from my earlier post (enclosed) UEFA is not the enemy any longer. We have BOTH been used. Don’t let them win. Don’t join in. Forget it. City know it. We can learn it.
It’s very predictable but clever. If UEFA get hammered we LOSE.
The CFCB looks in need of a rebuild anyway, so UEFA can sacrifice that easily enough - that KHR quote alludes to similar.
I doubt that there's much to negotiate about - even if City have ammunition from CAS to do so. As you say, UEFA as a whole is not a target - it's too big to take on head-on.
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
The CFCB looks in need of a rebuild anyway, so UEFA can sacrifice that easily enough - that KHR quote alludes to similar.
I doubt that there's much to negotiate about - even if City have ammunition from CAS to do so. As you say, UEFA as a whole is not a target - it's too big to take on head-on.
Soriano hinted so strongly what was going on in his post FFP CL exclusion address.
Only elements of UEFA are the problem. UEFA realise this themselves now. It’s difficult but it’s better to weed them out than start again with KHR running it..because as sure as eggs is eggs that’s who moves in...then we really are in trouble.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
Soriano hinted so strongly what was going on in his post FFP CL exclusion address.
Only elements of UEFA are the problem. UEFA realise this themselves now. It’s difficult but it’s better to weed them out than start again with KHR running it..because as sure as eggs is eggs that’s who moves in...then we really are in trouble.
Ideally, I could see them rallying the non G14 sides to see if a pressure group can be put together. Who knows, some of the bigger French sides may be happy as PSG are untouchable.
Sadly, I expect City to want to be in the VIP section and keep others down.
King KdB of Belgium
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2018
- Messages
- 1,228
Cobwebcat what is wrong with that idea. We all know that the boards that at present are running UEFA, are heavily weighed against us. There are person's on UEFA boards from Livarpool, Man Utd, Bayern Munich, and other clubs from Italy and Spain.
If you take all that into consideration my idea isn't that bad an idea is it. If you have a better idea let's be having it.
If you take all that into consideration my idea isn't that bad an idea is it. If you have a better idea let's be having it.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
And here you have point 2 from my earlier post (enclosed) UEFA is not the enemy any longer. We have BOTH been used. Don’t let them win. Don’t join in. Forget it. City know it. We can learn it.
It’s very predictable but clever. If UEFA get hammered we LOSE.
Why is Rumenigge speaking out on the CAS case? What has a rival club like City got to do with him? This is the man who was fined by the German authorities after being caught smuggling two watches worth £90,000. He was on his way back from a European Club Association meeting in Qatar where he had been given the watches "as a gift." And yet his poisonous comments are always reported without this wider context. Bayern Munich are surely one of most disreputable clubs in Europe.
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
Cobwebcat what is wrong with that idea. We all know that the boards that at present are running UEFA, are heavily weighed against us. There are person's on UEFA boards from Livarpool, Man Utd, Bayern Munich, and other clubs from Italy and Spain.
If you take all that into consideration my idea isn't that bad an idea is it. If you have a better idea let's be having it.
I’ve already said over and over. The last one is literally 4 posts up
And here you have point 2 from my earlier post (enclosed) UEFA is not the enemy any longer. We have BOTH been used. Don’t let them win. Don’t join in. Forget it. City know it. We can learn it.
It’s very predictable but clever. If UEFA get hammered we LOSE.
I hate to have a go at City Xtra but I think this is an incomplete quote and changes the meaning of the quote.
If you look at City Report, they have the quote as "The UEFA panel reposnible for UCL matters didn't do a good job."
That's siding with Manchester City and attacking the CFCB Adjudicatory and Investigative Panels.
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
I hate to have a go at City Xtra but I think this is an incomplete quote and changes the meaning of the quote.
If you look at City Report, they have the quote as "The UEFA panel reposnible for UCL matters didn't do a good job."
That's siding with Manchester City and attacking the CFCB Adjudicatory and Investigative Panels.
No I read that. Wheels within wheels.
BM are one of the worst clubs for this. They run to UEFA all the time and make it look like they are after better Governance.
The same guys that get players to run their contracts down on a Bosman and call it respecting a players contract.
By “didn’t do a good job” he isn’t saying City are innocent
Bayern are not on our side believe me. They want to be in charge of all aspects of UEFA.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
Why is Rumenigge speaking out on the CAS case? What has a rival club like City got to do with him? This is the man who was fined by the German authorities after being caught smuggling two watches worth £90,000. He was on his way back from a European Club Association meeting in Qatar where he had been given the watches "as a gift." And yet his poisonous comments are always reported without this wider context. Bayern Munich are surely one of most disreputable clubs in Europe.
It's a quote from Kicker - it says so. It just means he was asked a question and answered it, probably in a post-season interview, and it's been translated.
There's really nothing wrong with him answering a question - whether you agree with his answer is a different matter.