MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
City claimed they were unrelated, which was challenged by UEFA but never resolved.
One of City's complaints to CAS was that UEFA completed its investigation before determining that. I can only assume that had the CFCB concluded that they were a related party (which City have always denied) the charges would have been baseless and therefore presumably not brought. But it seems they were judged at CAS as unrelated parties.
Could that have been just that there had not been a claim put to CAS from CFCB that they were related? That would then leave it like other stuff with City saying they're not related, and no-one saying they are.