You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Cavani Speculation/News 3 (or 4)
- Thread starter Bluesiam
- Start date
no place in the city line up for Cavani ? seriously i have heard it all now.Caveman said:I don't want him. We will be paying one up front and I want that to be Kun. We will be playing three behind a main striker and I don't want one of those three to be Kun as it's not his best position. We will have three of Nasri Navas Silva and possibly Isco to choose from and I'm certain that after a while Milner's qualities will get him games, he's too valuable a player not to be important for us. That doesn't offer a place to Cavani, for me.bodak said:Just to re-iterate a previous poster we have 3 strikers who are more than capable (and have proved so) of scoring 20 goals + in a season. We have the creativity of Silva, Navas and Nasri (I dispute the fact he is not a good player) and if we manage to get Isco as well then what a superb attacking force we'd be. So why do we actually need Cavani? If we do get him (I personally think its another Sanchez scenario - sorry to sound negative) then even better but I still think with the above and some tinkering at the back (we need another CB) then we'll be strong.
I get the feeling that every time a (supposed) world class player becomes available we should just sign him and if we dont then we've failed (and its all Marwood's fault).
salfordblue-tony2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 1,626
zeven said:You compare Cavani with Andy fucking Carroll?moz said:not sure about this... prem wont suit cavani disaster of steve daley proportions springs to mind.........
andy carroll mind .....cheep as chips gotta b worth a punt ;)
Better in the air.
zeven
Well-Known Member
Now i understand your choice of nickname. You do know that Pellegrini prefer to play with TWO strikers right?Caveman said:I don't want him. We will be paying one up front and I want that to be Kun. We will be playing three behind a main striker and I don't want one of those three to be Kun as it's not his best position. We will have three of Nasri Navas Silva and possibly Isco to choose from and I'm certain that after a while Milner's qualities will get him games, he's too valuable a player not to be important for us. That doesn't offer a place eto Cavani, for me.bodak said:Just to re-iterate a previous poster we have 3 strikers who are more than capable (and have proved so) of scoring 20 goals + in a season. We have the creativity of Silva, Navas and Nasri (I dispute the fact he is not a good player) and if we manage to get Isco as well then what a superb attacking force we'd be. So why do we actually need Cavani? If we do get him (I personally think its another Sanchez scenario - sorry to sound negative) then even better but I still think with the above and some tinkering at the back (we need another CB) then we'll be strong.
I get the feeling that every time a (supposed) world class player becomes available we should just sign him and if we dont then we've failed (and its all Marwood's fault).
Caveman said:I don't want him. We will be paying one up front and I want that to be Kun. We will be playing three behind a main striker and I don't want one of those three to be Kun as it's not his best position. We will have three of Nasri Navas Silva and possibly Isco to choose from and I'm certain that after a while Milner's qualities will get him games, he's too valuable a player not to be important for us. That doesn't offer a place to Cavani, for me.bodak said:Just to re-iterate a previous poster we have 3 strikers who are more than capable (and have proved so) of scoring 20 goals + in a season. We have the creativity of Silva, Navas and Nasri (I dispute the fact he is not a good player) and if we manage to get Isco as well then what a superb attacking force we'd be. So why do we actually need Cavani? If we do get him (I personally think its another Sanchez scenario - sorry to sound negative) then even better but I still think with the above and some tinkering at the back (we need another CB) then we'll be strong.
I get the feeling that every time a (supposed) world class player becomes available we should just sign him and if we dont then we've failed (and its all Marwood's fault).
Lets hope Aguero doesn't get injured then eh?
D
D
Deleted member 52846
Guest
May as well get rid of Kun then? No point hindering his career with him being on our bench, is there? Because if we play Cavani, there's no place for Agüero in our team.ballinio said:no place in the city line up for Cavani ? seriously i have heard it all now.Caveman said:I don't want him. We will be paying one up front and I want that to be Kun. We will be playing three behind a main striker and I don't want one of those three to be Kun as it's not his best position. We will have three of Nasri Navas Silva and possibly Isco to choose from and I'm certain that after a while Milner's qualities will get him games, he's too valuable a player not to be important for us. That doesn't offer a place to Cavani, for me.bodak said:Just to re-iterate a previous poster we have 3 strikers who are more than capable (and have proved so) of scoring 20 goals + in a season. We have the creativity of Silva, Navas and Nasri (I dispute the fact he is not a good player) and if we manage to get Isco as well then what a superb attacking force we'd be. So why do we actually need Cavani? If we do get him (I personally think its another Sanchez scenario - sorry to sound negative) then even better but I still think with the above and some tinkering at the back (we need another CB) then we'll be strong.
I get the feeling that every time a (supposed) world class player becomes available we should just sign him and if we dont then we've failed (and its all Marwood's fault).
ballinio said:no place in the city line up for Cavani ? seriously i have heard it all now.Caveman said:I don't want him. We will be paying one up front and I want that to be Kun. We will be playing three behind a main striker and I don't want one of those three to be Kun as it's not his best position. We will have three of Nasri Navas Silva and possibly Isco to choose from and I'm certain that after a while Milner's qualities will get him games, he's too valuable a player not to be important for us. That doesn't offer a place to Cavani, for me.bodak said:Just to re-iterate a previous poster we have 3 strikers who are more than capable (and have proved so) of scoring 20 goals + in a season. We have the creativity of Silva, Navas and Nasri (I dispute the fact he is not a good player) and if we manage to get Isco as well then what a superb attacking force we'd be. So why do we actually need Cavani? If we do get him (I personally think its another Sanchez scenario - sorry to sound negative) then even better but I still think with the above and some tinkering at the back (we need another CB) then we'll be strong.
I get the feeling that every time a (supposed) world class player becomes available we should just sign him and if we dont then we've failed (and its all Marwood's fault).
Based on the previous post is he better then Aguero then? Obviously you know categorically that he'll simply come over, slot in and score 50 goals?
zeven
Well-Known Member
WTF. Pellegrini playes with two strikers.Caveman said:May as well get rid of Kun then? No point hindering his career with him being on our bench, is there? Because if we play Cavani, there's no place for Agüero in our team.ballinio said:no place in the city line up for Cavani ? seriously i have heard it all now.Caveman said:I don't want him. We will be paying one up front and I want that to be Kun. We will be playing three behind a main striker and I don't want one of those three to be Kun as it's not his best position. We will have three of Nasri Navas Silva and possibly Isco to choose from and I'm certain that after a while Milner's qualities will get him games, he's too valuable a player not to be important for us. That doesn't offer a place to Cavani, for me.
Caveman said:May as well get rid of Kun then? No point hindering his career with him being on our bench, is there? Because if we play Cavani, there's no place for Agüero in our team.
Why not? Are you assuming we will strictly follow the 4-3-3 with one striker format? Soriano has said the first team manager will NOT be forced into any one formation and will have tactical freedom. We could easily play Aguero behind Cavani like he played behind Forlan with great success. There is no way Aguero will be benched so don't you think our pursuit of a top striker is with playing them both in mind?