Whilst I strongly lean towards the suspicion that VAR isn't being implemented fairly (and to our detriment, in many cases), I am still very much in favour of keeping it.
You see, now with VAR, the controversies are being highlighted, measured and recorded.
This is going to be a very important resource for City as things progress.
Already, we can point to:
* VAR reverting back to an incident on the edge of our box, in an effort to disallow Aguero's goal v Schalke.
* VAR being used to give a very dodgy handball , penalty decision against us.
* VAR being used to give another penalty which certainly wasn't "clear and obvious" v Schalke.
* Aguero's goal at Wembley being disallowed when doing so wasn't "clear and obvious" either.
That's four incidents, clearly recorded (the first three, when VAR wasn't even working properly!). It's not fun, having to suffer through the bullshit and bias but it's going to be very hard for the powers-that-be to deny there is a systematic bias if (and when) the statistics prove that we are more heavily disadvantaged than other clubs.
The counter argument will, inevitably, propose that VAR is arbitrarily applied and beyond reproach but that becomes a very tenuous position to defend if (as I suspect) the evidence stacks up to show that one club is being inordinately scrutinized.
And the evidence is (ahem, brace yourself because this is hilarious) clear and obvious, now.
VAR wasn’t used for the Fernandinho foul vs Schalke