Am told that United received no charges for the postponement as it was outside the ground?
Seems a bit of a side step. Yes it's outside the ground, but the actions surely affected a football game and potentially set a precedent for mard arses everywhere.
On the reverse, in our case efforts were made to identify and prosecute the fans individually, and action was taken against the club by the governing body.
As for us, guilty no question. We've all enjoyed a pitch invasion or two in our time, that time has gone. Too many unstable folk around in modern society to turn a blind eye anymore, and sooner or later one idiot will think to just buy a ticket to the game in order to take out some player, because the voices said so, because he said something on social media, because he lost or because his girlfriend told her mates once that she thinks he's fit.
Although the next media outlet that suggests their keeper was mortally wounded by a passing fan should be kicked out of our press conferences for a season.
But I think that change in approach from the authorities stinks, no wonder it leads to suggestions of bias and favouritism.