city fanzines....

this is dante, formerly of the fightback and occasional contributor to king of the kippax. i have watched this thread develop and i have tried to stay out of this but i want to step in now, as it feel i have a duty to explain to people who weren't there what things were really like and why as a group of fanzines we were never wholly together and always falling out.

whilst i don't say noel bayley was a bully (although he did try to intimidate me at times) , my first hand experience of him was that the falling out between various parties was down to him.

i don't know anything about noel and blueprint ( i wasn't involved with the fanzines then) but my first experience of noel was a positive one. i pitched up outside the north stand one night with 20 hand stapled copies of a magazine i put together in my bedroom. he smiled and straight away asked me if i bought blueprint - to which i said no - and then he bought my first copy. (he was obviously carrying it on with blueprint then, this was near the end of 1993, we beat everton 1-0 with a carl griffiths goal..) it was the one with howard kendall on the back with the message "one more scouser on the dole". noel liked it very much and said it was funny. he did a review in his mag (which i didn't want him to) but still said it had made him laugh and his last words were - buy it. Which was great.

i have to say here at this stage, i did the fanzine because i was influenced by what was going on with the swales out campaign at the time but enjoyed writing and wanted to write about something i love which is city. (soulboy on here made a flippant remark about all fanzine editors being in it for the money - whilst it's true that when i sold fanzines those were the days when i could afford to go to every away game - i go to a quarter of them now - but the reason i got involved was because i had a burning ambition to do so ... soulboy was just saying that for a reaction, and hopefully he himself will share his thoughts on the fanzine war... won't you ???)

anyway, i ended up writing a column for king of the kippax for a couple of years which probably put me in noel's bad books... guilty by association i suppose...but noel would have a pop at me if i was ever selling kk, which was only 3/4 times a season, he would say "why are you selling that shit"

eventually with college out of the way and with city in freefall i decided to bring out the fightback, which ran throughout the late 90s. i lived in sale and went to my local printers in sale - anthony wood ltd - to get copies done. it just so happened noel used the same printers, i wasn't to know - and noel then phones me up at work slagging me off saying "why are you nicking my printers, why don't you go somewhere else"

it was always stand-offish between me and noel because i was mates with one of his brothers and noel thought his brother was "siding" against him, where in reality he wasn't doing anything off the sort, he just wanted to stay out of it and could probably see that noel's problem with me was that i used to write for dave wallace , which in his eyes put me in the dave wallace camp.

i had some contacts at the club and was of the opinion that if francis lee stayed on as chairman we would end up in division 2, which we did do. i was saying this as early as the summer of 1996 when we had been relegated out of the premier under alan ball. as a result my fanzine and myself ended up being the main face of the campaign to get rid off francis, or at least encourage him to resign so that he may be at least be remembered as a great former player and city hero rather than terrible chairman. we went public with a lot of things we knew but whereas the swales out campaign had the support of all the fanzines at the time, noel's mag wasn't behind the lee out campaign. not all fans supported our campaign - people would come up to me and say "why don't you get behind them". also our problem was that we couldn't trust anybody else. if we couldn't trust francis who could we trust ? so we didn't back anybody else. at the time i was 23 and up against a brick wall because i had people who just wouldn't have it that lee was making things worse and then i had noel taking pot-shots at me in his mag every month, ridiculing the campaign or making jokes out of my name.

with noel it was all personal.

dave knew that at one time i felt king of the kippax was a bit of touch and i would tell him so. i said "it's like a fanzine for old people now !" - he would interrupt my column with his editing or poke fun at how many chins i had this week but we'd never fall out about it, we can still get on now but everything with noel was took personally and made into something personal. he liked my magazine when it was a handful of copies being sold. at our peak in 1998 we'd shift 1400 so it was a bit more competition for him. he didn't like that and he didn't like me. in my final fightback i even said my experience of why the fanzine lads don't get on is because of noel, he's fallen out with everyone else and now he's fallen out with me.

he used to get leanne to say things to you whilst selling, gary phillips to say things whilst selling . he's get his people to blank you.. that was my experience of him. if i was with my mates he'd shout over "you think you're hard when you're with your mates"... and if i was on my own he'd say "you're not so hard without your mates round you"... it didn't need to be violent to be bullying - it could be just verbals which was my experience of noel really.

even when i started on the city mag he would slag us off in his teletext column "arsenal away, it must have been a big game if dante friend went" - i have all the copies of work i have done at our house and i have read through them again. when i have had a pop at noel it's simply because he's been having a pop at me for a few weeks beforehand.

so why go public with all this ? well, i was a fanzine editor but also involved with the fanzines for 10 years. 1993 to 2000 with the fightback and king of the kippax and then i was "mr blue sky" in city til i cry for a couple of years in the 2000s. i have stood there in all weather with the other fanzine lads - apart from blueprint - although there was one season when me and this charming fan were both selling (94?) and in the main i got on with everyone although it was a bit stand-off ish with franny fowles (are you blue or are you blind) and these days i get on great with the chips and gravy lads, see tommo everywhere, but at the time they thought i was a bit of a "troublecauser" and that might have been a negative impression given to them by noel.

noel you have had some personal stick on here which isn't nice. i know it isn't nice because i used to get it off you !

one half of me thinks, don't post anything, let things go but then after reading all this i just think fanzine readers would find it interesting , what went on. this thread turned sour on page 11 when noel said dave "wants to be in the limelight" - i just feel that's how these things start, dave wallace's people then come on the board, then blueprint and then it all goes off again.

no doubt noel will respond in kind and give his side of things and i would be interested to hear them. in fact i would like him and dave wallace to say where they feel it went wrong between them as well and maybe it would give us all closure as i feel his problem with me was that i was dave's mate.

i have nothing personally against noel now, although i did at the time... but i have moved on. it's all in the past but that's how it was for me.
 
Assuming you're back from Asda Phill {sic}, let me tell you that I don't shop there myself, given that its parent company, WalMart, is strictly anti-union. You may have sold your socialist principles along with your soul too for all I know, but I certainly haven't.

Secondly, I met a mate of mine in the pub this afternoon and asked him how he spelt his name. After looking at me as if I was stupid, he responded: "P-h-i-l. How else would I spell it?" Exactly. I wondered aloud if he'd ever though of spelling it with two 'l's which elicited a curt "No" amazingly enough. Just a thought, but maybe it's time to drop the superfluous 'l' eh, Phill? You're fooling no-one.

Thirdly, as I have already stated, I'm sticking with my story; I've got nothing further to add however you dress it up.

On to Dante's interesting, if somewhat lugubrious, post but before I do, I'll preface this further by saying that at least Dante had the good grace to PM me to warn me that he would be posting, even if he didn't share the details! For that alone, I respect him and yes, I'll have a pint with him any time.

When Dante started his fanzine The Fightback, I welcomed him with open arms. It seemed like the right thing to do; admittedly for someone so young it also seemed a brave thing to do: entering into the maelstrom of the world of City fanzines. As he has related I gave him a positive review. Unfortunately, however, Dante committed a couple of cardinal sins.

As I understand it, he used his fanzine as a vehicle to have a go at someone with whom he worked. Again, as I understand it, the woman's husband threatened him with litigation and with that, he went into Sportspages with a pair of scissors to physically remove the offending article/s, while leaving the controversial, if depleted, issue on the shelves at the cover price. I'm sure he'll correct me on this if I'm wrong.

Amongst fanzine editors there are - or, at least, there were - certain things you just didn't discuss: print runs, costs, your printer (ask one of them and see how far you get). The details of your respective printer was guarded zealously. I also paid my dues to HMRC for the record. While I accept that Dante lived close to my printers, it should also be pointed out that he did indeed work with my younger brother at the time - as he himself has said. My belief was that he may have divulged info to Dante. I'm not saying Dante set about it with a sense of purpose; it was more likely to have been in passing. However, had he - or anyone else for that matter - asked I would have answered his questions, as I occasionally did when asked by others.

From a realistic stance I approached him with the scenario that were we both to go to the same printer with our respective issues at the same time, I would have expected priority; a reasonable probability in my opinion and, with that, I suggested he looked elsewhere.

Nevertheless, having supported Dante as the new kid (literally) on the block, I was - admittedly - dismayed when he gravitated towards Dave and his cronies. After all, and as we have already seen, "the line it [was] drawn the curse it [was] cast," to paraphrase Bob Dylan. He made his choice, but - again, if I remember rightly - I think he went to matches with Dave so it was probably worth his effort. I had been there myself; after all, I had travelled to matches with Dave when we were very young and BP were our (you'll note 'our' rather than mine alone) natural enemy. In response to why it all went wrong with Dave, I think I've already answered that one with regards to the fan on the board imbroglio (cf your own quote that I said he "wants to be in the limelight").

What Dante and others refer to as "intimidation" I would describe as banter; there was plenty of banter in those days. "It must be a big game because BluePrint are here/Bill Borrows is here!" were popular refrains given that they missed several deadlines and because Bill came from nowhere with impeccable Blue credentials, even though nobody knew him from Adam. However, this was extended to others and often - including myself from Bill! It was popular currency at the time. I never lost any sleep over it anyway. But I digress. Maybe Dante, like a few others, could give it out but could not handle it? But I do think that those who are crying wolf and claiming "intimidation" and "bullying" almost a decade after the event are mardarses, to be honest. They do themselves a disservice and make themselves look ridiculous, especially in Dante's case (see next para). As for his submission that I somehow instructed people in what to say, that is mere speculation on his part and laughable speculation at that; if only I'd have been that influential!

Admittedly it took another fanzine editor to point it out to me but while Dante was denouncing football hooliganism in print there was a dichotomy here in that he appeared to be in thrall to it at the same time in real life. He appeared to run with the pack and I think he definitely fancied himself as a hard man but, in reality, I suspect he was nothing more than a voyeur given what I have seen and heard. Either way, I urged my brother to distance himself from him. I well recall being in The Osbourne after one game when somebody rushed in with the news that it had kicked off outside the ground, before adding: "Dante Friend is leading from the back!" You don't forget a comment like that, never mind that the pub was in convulsions. it's hardly surprising then that some thought of Dante as a bit of a "troublecauser." Certainly, there were more than a few eyebrows raise when he started writing for an official publication given this unfortunate background.
 
BTH said:
Assuming you're back from Asda Phill {sic}, let me tell you that I don't shop there myself, given that its parent company, WalMart, is strictly anti-union. You may have sold your socialist principles along with your soul too for all I know, but I certainly haven't.

Secondly, I met a mate of mine in the pub this afternoon and asked him how he spelt his name. After looking at me as if I was stupid, he responded: "P-h-i-l. How else would I spell it?" Exactly. I wondered aloud if he'd ever though of spelling it with two 'l's which elicited a curt "No" amazingly enough. Just a thought, but maybe it's time to drop the superfluous 'l' eh, Phill? You're fooling no-one.

Thirdly, as I have already stated, I'm sticking with my story; I've got nothing further to add however you dress it up.

Yes I'm back from Asda. Please do tell me where you shop and what brand of clothes you wear Noel. I'm sure your credentials are 100% ethical eh? And who said I was ever a socialist?
Do you eat meat? If so, glad to see you involved in the slaughter of animals for your gratification. Wear leather clothing? Murderer for your vanity. I could go on. No one is perfect. Not even you. Though I'm sure you will disagree with me on that one.

I'm extremely flattered that you took the time in your busy schedule to discuss my name spelling with your friend. Wow. What an interesting life you lead.

You keep saying ''as I have stated, I'm sticking with my story'', but the fact remains, you didn't answer the question I posed in your statement.
Your statement said you assaulted me because I pushed your girlfriend.
I asked the question if it was correct that before I allegedly pushed her, your girlfriend left your side, walked a short distance towards me on her own and aggressively attempted to snatch my bag of fanzines and left empty handed back to your side.

Now, here is the bit where you get interactive Noel.
Please answer YES or NO if that is a correct statement. I don't want any other answer other than yes or no. Did she or didn't she do that.
I apologise if other people are bored with me posting this but I make no apology for doing so and will continue to ask the same question until a yes or no answer is provided.

Finally, how f*cking arrogant are you to suggest that I have to send a private message to you in advance, to inform you that I am going to post anything on this site? Who the f*ck do you think you are?
I don't need your permission or approval to do anything.
 
Didnt realise things were so bad in those days and I used to sell one! Must have walked round with my eyes shut! Just glad I wasnt involved but having met Dave, Noel and Phil since,I have to say I find all 3 no problem and they have always been sound with me with Dave,Sue and Noel offering words of sympathy with my loss of Dad. Personally I will always have time for them, as I got on fine then and now.
 
What a strange direction this thread has gone in. It started out a really good one but has descended into bitching and back-biting. How sad.

I respect anyone who gets off their backsides and does something like edit a fanzine. The problem is, as I know from my personal experience of putting your head above the parapet, that people find it easier to be negative. It also seems that some take themselves a bit too seriously.

It was all a long time ago so grow up and put it in the past, where it belongs.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
What a strange direction this thread has gone in. It started out a really good one but has descended into bitching and back-biting. How sad.

I respect anyone who gets off their backsides and does something like edit a fanzine. The problem is, as I know from my personal experience of putting your head above the parapet, that people find it easier to be negative. It also seems that some take themselves a bit too seriously.

It was all a long time ago so grow up and put it in the past, where it belongs.

You may not believe this but I agree with you. It has been with a heavy sigh I have responded on this thread, but I couldn't stand by and see someone re-write history to their advantage at the expense of others.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.