ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN
Well-Known Member
He was the one I listened to in car on way home and I was shouting at the radio
“What the fuck are you on about”
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
He was the one I listened to in car on way home and I was shouting at the radio
“What the fuck are you on about”
CTID1977
Well-Known Member
Didn’t understand a fucking thing in the statement: has the club fucked the cunts? Thanks in advance for answering
super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 47,904
I wonder which 3 clubs are driving this...
Pretty much all American owned....
bluetonium
Well-Known Member
It's not unusual for companies in breech of competition law to be fined, in the UK it's 10% of your income. If that does happen, and furthermore legal costs and even city sueing for loss of income is on the cards, where is all that money coming from?
I think we've all seen Masters is a dead man walking for some time, certainly City did when we made those comments about his understudy being so gracious to attend our premier league winners crowning last season.
The endgame here is not to dispose of all rules, nor to open up a free for all. It's to bring a fairness and transparency of a legally sound framework for each member club to adhere to, even if they'd rather be kept blindfolded, and to remove the diseased self-appointed aristocracy of the English game to prevent them continuing to shape the game to their benefit.
If the premier league is the glass house.....
I think we've all seen Masters is a dead man walking for some time, certainly City did when we made those comments about his understudy being so gracious to attend our premier league winners crowning last season.
The endgame here is not to dispose of all rules, nor to open up a free for all. It's to bring a fairness and transparency of a legally sound framework for each member club to adhere to, even if they'd rather be kept blindfolded, and to remove the diseased self-appointed aristocracy of the English game to prevent them continuing to shape the game to their benefit.
If the premier league is the glass house.....
Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 14,837
Exactly, they are either illegal or not.I read it as we provided a whole lot of reasons why we believed the rules were unlawful. The fact that the panel agreed with some of the reasons means the rules are unlawful. The fact they didn’t agree with every reason doesn’t make the rules a bit lawful. They’re unlawful full stop.
It’s like saying a disallowed goal wasn’t offside but it was only disallowed because of a foul on the keeper. It doesn’t make it a part goal.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
That Newcastle evidence and the suggestion from Tolmie there are also damning emails could damage the PL's reputation even more. It is obvious they have been acting in bad faith all along.It points that the Premier league are not to be believed in all that they do
Reputation is hanging by a thread if any and why would anyone believe them
BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 20,304
Don't think so. Other than, as you say, the PL have a problem knowing their arse from their elbow, which bodes well.
Yeah. Perception and narrative are in our favour. Unlikely to make any material difference, but it can’t do any harm.
The Etihad deal was up for renewal for another 10 years and its was for about £800million
About right, 80.million a season.
St Helens Blue (Exiled)
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,616
1st night of 4 tonight at the airport.
Absoluteley buzzing with this.
Will be smiling at every fucking post.
'Heads back to page 913'
Absoluteley buzzing with this.
Will be smiling at every fucking post.
'Heads back to page 913'