matty barton said:Piegilles said:foetus said:This is the important bit. We've had a history of arrogant arsenal fans on this forum before. I know of at least one arsenal fan on here currently who tends to grind with the majority of our posters. You also have to remember that arsenal fans (not all) have become very bitter towards us since the takeover so the relationship isn't great. I'd steer clear for a couple of days should you happen to win ;)
All clubs have their fair share of arseholes, might I suggest even yours?
I don't have a problem with City. I made the point in an earlier post that given your ups and down over the last 40 years or so and having to endure the success of your Salford neighbours, it would be churlish to begrudge you the success you now have. I think it's good for Manchester to have a rivalry on more level terms.
In my experience, if there is strong animus from Arsenal fans its primarily directed against 'The Dark Side' 3 miles up the road from us and Man Yoo, the latter not so much because of their success, though that grates, but because of the God given right their fans believe they have to constantly dominate English football made worse by the gracelessness and oafish bullying of their previous manager.
In fact, when Aguero scored in the last minute or so to secure the title, I'd say 99% of Arsenal fans applauded and we hugely enjoyed seeing the bemused faces of Rooney, Fergie et al on the pitch at Sunderland after the final whistle made better by the mockery and scorn heaped on them by the home fans.
I'm travelling to Manchester for the game so whatever happens, I won't be around for a day or two afterwards anyway.
That's not really true though. Just because we are guests on a City forum doesn't mean we need to twist facts to ingratiate ourselves.
United are not our natural rivals. It's a club we dislike, but that's about it.
The fans who passionately hate United are generally those who came on board during the early Wenger years. They are ABUs.
When Abramovich arrived and we dropped off the majority considered United a lesser evil than Chelsea, probably because of the sense of humiliation that a club like that, from our own city, was now more successful than us. We dislike United, look down our noses at Chelsea (before and after Abramivich, but for different reasons) and we hate Tottenham.
With City it was a bit more balanced. I'd say 50-50 between those who felt that "at least United are a proper club like us while City are the new Chelski " and those who were pleased that a club with a likable fanbase had pissed on United and Chelski.
id go one further and say that nasri aside its actually difficult to hate city due to the fact that all their players and manager as well actually genuinly seem like nice guys rather then pricks like rooney/rvp etc.
whereas chelsea have the likes of mourinho/terry/cole even lampard who i don't like, utd have rooney/rvp amongst others. city really don't have any players i hate or even dislike. so i find it hard to dislike city, even if i don't like them.