bluesince76
Well-Known Member
FixedThe problem with swaps is, would you go to Spurs?
FixedThe problem with swaps is, would you go to Spurs?
Think the Sane money at least is ear marked this year to balance last years losses, don't think it's 'spending money'.Reminder that the Sane and Angelino money hits the books for this fiscal year. With other expected sales we will have a decent amount on top of what a normal budget would be.
Is there a limit for English & home grown? Thought we could have as many as we liked - & it’s foreign players that have limits? Totally don’t understand the quota systemWe don't. It just means they count as non homegrown, no different to any other foreign player.
forget Home growm and Foreign labels. We have 17 free places that can be anything. On top of that we are allowed the extra homegromn only players.Is there a limit for English & home grown? Thought we could have as many as we liked - & it’s foreign players that have limits? Totally don’t understand the quota system
Is there a limit for English & home grown? Thought we could have as many as we liked - & it’s foreign players that have limits? Totally don’t understand the quota system
Fixed
I don’t see any scenario that tempts Sterling to either club.i think spurs or arsenal could temp sterling because he would be the main man and play every week
also being a north london lad then if kane wants out of spurs then sterling could be the player most likely temped
city do have money and even heard a new long term sponsorship is in the pipe line and would bring in close to £900million for a ten year deal
You think we will pay 150m for Kane??Think we will end up getting Kane and Grealish and losing Jesus and Bernado and the striker on loan at Anderlecht last season.
88 plus 150 less 60 less 55 - 238 less 115 - 123 net spend - offset with the striker i refer to going and sane and Angelino money and it will equate to 60 million ish net spend.
You think we will pay 150m for Kane??