Why aren’t the big clubs lobbying to review this? Grounds like ours with plenty of space it would easily work. Maybe not over at Old Scaffold though.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Configuration For The Expansion Of The North Stand - Seating - Standing - Season Ticket & Match Day Ticket Prices
- Thread starter jrb
- Start date
Invisible Man's Bandage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2020
- Messages
- 2,936
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Maybe because there has been no standing for decades and it is only fairly recently that clubs have been firstly allowed to trial it and then actually install it permanently.Why aren’t the big clubs lobbying to review this? Grounds like ours with plenty of space it would easily work. Maybe not over at Old Scaffold though.
There are things that are common in Germany and elsewhere that would never be allowed here again. 1.5 standing ratio for rail seating, fences around the stands to prevent pitch invasions etc
Let's say all that is completely true, and the club go on to blow it for the opening of the stand.
What's to stop them doing this excersise, next season, the one after, or in 5 years time (when we have worked our way back up from non-league).
This 'last chance' narrative, while catchy for the purposes of promoting the fight with the club, is not really complete is it.
It is an issue of how it is occupied and allocated. Which is a very different issue to the south stand, which suffers from being split up by the 3 tier arrangement. If you accept the design itself when built, is flexible enough, which it 100% is, then there will be quite a few last chances.
Of course, in an ideal world they do the prep work now and get it done first time, everyone would want that. But is it really a now or never with this one? Not convinced it is.
There won’t be anymore chances to create a proper singing section once season tickets are sold on NSL2.
From my experience with 1894, season ticket holders will not be moved to create a larger nucleus of singers.
1894 asked for more seats together for CL games in the centre of 115, but we were told that couldn’t be done as seats were already sold to fans on the CL cup scheme.
As a compromise the club gave 1894 x amount of seats at the front of 115 that weren’t occupied by fans on the CL cup scheme, and weren’t already sold.
I can’t remember exactly how many seats there were. I think it was between 30 to 50 seats?
As we all know, it’s hard to generate chants and an atmosphere from the front of a block, directly behind the goal, and to one side of the goal. We were kept away from the European Ultras.
For a proper singing section to work in the new NSL2 the club have to set aside x amount of safe standing seats. The club has to market those seats as ‘singing section safe standing seats ONLY’. And involve the fans in that process. Selling those seats to fans who ‘express a desire’ to want to stand, sing, and want to create an atmosphere.
There are enough singers in SSL1, 111, 110, 109, SSL3, and scattered around the ground to create a decent singing section on NSL2.
Last edited:
HelloCity
Well-Known Member
If they just copied the south stand then it actually would have saved a lot of hassle in terms of configuration.
The second tier would stay as it was but with the middle block being hospitality and the bar/restaurant area being linked to the hotel.
The new third tier would just be priced like the south stand third tier with potentially a safe standing area towards the back.
Instead we’ve built this huge Kop-like structure but everyone is so far apart in terms of vision, and the club don’t want to upset anyone by moving them, that it’s basically just going to be a visual rather than an actual proper home end.
It’s going to have premium seats, a family stand, a mix of match day and flexi gold standard seats, safe standing section at the very back and a sky bar. It’s basically a stand designed by committee where they try to satisfy everyone all at once. It’s going to be the stand in the stadium with the most diverse audience makeup.
The second tier would stay as it was but with the middle block being hospitality and the bar/restaurant area being linked to the hotel.
The new third tier would just be priced like the south stand third tier with potentially a safe standing area towards the back.
Instead we’ve built this huge Kop-like structure but everyone is so far apart in terms of vision, and the club don’t want to upset anyone by moving them, that it’s basically just going to be a visual rather than an actual proper home end.
It’s going to have premium seats, a family stand, a mix of match day and flexi gold standard seats, safe standing section at the very back and a sky bar. It’s basically a stand designed by committee where they try to satisfy everyone all at once. It’s going to be the stand in the stadium with the most diverse audience makeup.
Last edited:
If they just copied the south stand then it actually would have saved a lot of hassle in terms of configuration.
The second tier would stay as it was but with the middle block being hospitality and the bar/restaurant area being linked to the hotel.
The new third tier would just be priced like the south stand third tier with potentially a safe standing area towards the back.
Instead we’ve built this huge Kop-like structure but everyone is so far apart in terms of vision, and the club don’t want to upset anyone by moving them, that it’s basically just going to be a visual rather than an actual proper home end.
It’s going to have premium seats, a family stand, a mix of match day and flexi gold standard seats, safe standing section at the very back and a sky bar. It’s basically a stand designed by committee where they try to satisfy everyone all at once. It’s going to be the stand in the stadium with the most diverse audience makeup.
I’ve always thought of the new NSL2 as being a complete mish-mash of seating, match day options, etc, not catering for any specific City fan base or City fan base requirement.
The club has thrown a bit of everything into NSL2 trying to drive as much match day revenue as possible out of it, and in the process, trying to cater for every City fan, hoping the fans will be happy with what the club has decided to do with NSL2.
At the back of NSL2 you’ve got hotel balconies, in front of those hotel balconies there’s going to be a safe standing singing section with 3000 fans, apparently, and below that there will be 5000 seated fans, which will include a hospitality section at the front of the NSL2.
Apart from other issues that may arise, fans close to the safe standing section who are in the 5000 seated section will definitely stand, especially for the big games. That will have a ripple effect on those 5000 seats as other fans in those seats will have to stand as well to watch the match. Stewards will be continually trying to get people to sit down in their seats like they have been doing in 109 and in SSL3 for years without much success.
Last edited:
Invisible Man's Bandage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2020
- Messages
- 2,936
- Team supported
- Manchester City
@jrb
I won't quote your post above but you can either say the new NS will be a mish mash or equally you could say it appeals to various sections of our supporter base. It can't be compared to SS3 as that is a very basic design with a very low quality concourse and basically a few kiosks serving food and drink. The new stand will link to the covered 3000 capacity City Square and it will have far superior food and drink offerings. The Sky Bar and GA+ sections plus hotel rooms take it to a completely different level compared to SS3.
I've been in SS3 since it opened and I think it's great but then I don't want any pre or post match entertainment and I don't buy any food or drink at the stadium. Fortunately for the club not everyone is such a miserable, tight **** like me though :)
I won't quote your post above but you can either say the new NS will be a mish mash or equally you could say it appeals to various sections of our supporter base. It can't be compared to SS3 as that is a very basic design with a very low quality concourse and basically a few kiosks serving food and drink. The new stand will link to the covered 3000 capacity City Square and it will have far superior food and drink offerings. The Sky Bar and GA+ sections plus hotel rooms take it to a completely different level compared to SS3.
I've been in SS3 since it opened and I think it's great but then I don't want any pre or post match entertainment and I don't buy any food or drink at the stadium. Fortunately for the club not everyone is such a miserable, tight **** like me though :)
pride in battle
Well-Known Member
Whats this obsession to be near the away fans ? I don't get it ?We’re going to end up a singing section with a terrible view of the game low behind the goal in SSL1 or another one right at the back of NSL2. They will barely be able to hear each other.
I think I’ll be staying in SSL3. Hopefully move a bit closer to the away fans from where I am now.
If they just copied the south stand then it actually would have saved a lot of hassle in terms of configuration.
The second tier would stay as it was but with the middle block being hospitality and the bar/restaurant area being linked to the hotel.
The new third tier would just be priced like the south stand third tier with potentially a safe standing area towards the back.
Instead we’ve built this huge Kop-like structure but everyone is so far apart in terms of vision, and the club don’t want to upset anyone by moving them, that it’s basically just going to be a visual rather than an actual proper home end.
It’s going to have premium seats, a family stand, a mix of match day and flexi gold standard seats, safe standing section at the very back and a sky bar. It’s basically a stand designed by committee where they try to satisfy everyone all at once. It’s going to be the stand in the stadium with the most diverse audience makeup.
Excluding the jibe in the last paragraph, which is bollocks, which would you rather prefer?
Last edited:
Banter?Whats this obsession to be near the away fans ? I don't get it ?
Why aren’t the big clubs lobbying to review this? Grounds like ours with plenty of space it would easily work. Maybe not over at Old Scaffold though.
Think how long it took to get to the rail seating, as an option of returning mass standing in big stadia.