In agreement with many others, I won’t be watching, my position on this is one of total apathy. I don’t care about anything royal be it Charles, Harry and Meghan or whatever. I think I’m quite reflective of those in my age group (early 30s). I read a poll yesterday saying 80% of under 25s don’t care and that sounds about right to me. They’re an anachronism that has limped on into the 21st century by virtue of having two stable diplomatic monarchs that between them served over 130 years. Thus reducing the time available for a crazy one to come in and ruin their reputation and standing.
I also don’t find the tourism argument at all compelling. Nobody comes here to meet the queen or king personally, they come to see the ceremonies and the buildings. All of which would be easy to preserve without having some hereditary monarch sat in the chair. You can troop the colour and change the guard without a monarch.
All of that said, when it comes to finding alternatives… I’m also lukewarm about the thought of putting some other elected stooge in as a president. For the same reason I’m not entirely against the HoL (though I would want it to be reformed), there’s a balance to be struck between indirect democracy and direct democracy which is very important for stability. While I am philosophically opposed to monarchy, I think right now we have much bigger problems on which we need to be spending our political capital.
So yes, let them continue to exist for now but don’t ask me to care.