Coronavirus (2021) thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
So let me get this straight, you want those who refuse to get a vaccine to a deadly disease to be able to freely mingle with those who have had the vaccine and those who have not yet had the opportunity plus those for whom the vaccine hasn't worked, potentially leading to deaths and severe illness for those people, when there is no reason for them not to have a vaccine that could negate those risks? Astonishingly idiotic.

Throw away your smart phone and your pc if you are worried about other things. We are in a pandemic ffs.
Yes, because that's how society works and is literally the whole point of the vaccination programme.

Let's simplify your question.

Do you want the people who cannot have a covid vaccine to be able to mingle with people for whom it hasn't worked?

Do you want the people for whom a vaccine hasn't worked but voluntarily received it to be able to mingle with those who are vaccinated?

Do you want those who are vaccinated to be able to mingle with anyone who isn't in any capacity?

Where would you as an individual draw the lines?

Subsitute covid for any other disease that kills people for which a vaccination is readily available. Flu? Measles? Should we segregate those people too?

Perhaps I'm over-estimating people's abilities to think bigger picture here, but let me repeat exactly what i said in my previous post: It's not about this example, it's not about covid, it's about what this may allow a government to do in future.

I don't think government should exist in anywhere close to the capacity it does anyway, so i'm probably wasting my time on this argument.

Edit: I just saw the last line in the attached quote. If i'm worried about other things throw away my phone and pc? I'm only allowed to be concerned about one thing at a time? What a blinkered world view. Shame.
 
Last edited:
Scotland vaccination data:

1, 981, 818 first doses given - 38, 311 today - was 34, 516 yesterday & 19, 781 last week

181, 879 second doses given - 10, 987 today - was 8947 yesterday & 9074 last week

As you see vaccination numbers have ramped back up.


67% of all 60 - 65 year olds, 42% of all 55 - 59 year olds and 34% of all 50 - 55 year olds vaccinated.
 
Wales vaccination data:

1, 157, 251 first doses given - 17, 385 today - was 16. 935 yesterday & 11, 819 last week

289, 185 second doses given - 16, 202 today - was 8728 yesterday & 14, 364 last week
 


This could be interesting.

Fascinating to see how that works out.

Interesting to see how little politics matters in Brazil given that the two vaccines they use are the AZ and Chinese ones - that most of Europe now will likely run miles (or probably kilometres) from.

How this pans out will tell us a lot. Sad though it is that this town gets preferential treatment when so many are struggling in the country.

Might be good PR for AZ to offer quick, cheap supplies to match the experiment in other Brazilian towns.

More than one test of this kind is needed for surety. And Brazil needs help fast.
 
Yes, because that's how society works and is literally the whole point of the vaccination programme.

Let's simplify your question.

Do you want the people who cannot have a covid vaccine to be able to mingle with people for whom it hasn't worked?

Do you want the people for whom a vaccine hasn't worked but voluntarily received it to be able to mingle with those who are vaccinated?

Do you want those who are vaccinated to be able to mingle with anyone who isn't in any capacity?

Where would you as an individual draw the lines?

Subsitute covid for any other disease that kills people for which a vaccination is readily available. Flu? Measles? Should we segregate those people too?

Perhaps I'm over-estimating people's abilities to think bigger picture here, but let me repeat exactly what i said in my previous post: It's not about this example, it's not about covid, it's about what this may allow a government to do in future.

I don't think government should exist in anywhere close to the capacity it does anyway, so i'm probably wasting my time on this argument.
Your chatting nonsense because your overriding objective is anti government not the welfare of the population. Those who are at risk are not going to put themselves at risk. If the vaccine doesn't work for them then they (me included) will continue to shield like we have for a year. If some vulnerable don't have the vaccine for bullshit reasons then they have made their own bed. For those who can't have a vaccine there are alternatives that are not too far off by all accounts.
I hate this government but what are they to do? fuck the well being of the overwhelming majority of the population for the morons who believe facebook and twitter over scientists?
 
I don't think you read the responses.

My comment was a direct response to him saying he would gladly stay at home and not go to public areas if vaccination proof was required to go to them. There is no normality in that.

Also, if you'd kindly explain how I'm selfish, and what spanner I want to put in the works I'd appreciate it, because I'm pretty sure all I've done is express concern at the precedent set by requiring proof of vaccine to effectively go out in public.

I've already stated I'm for the vaccine and will be getting it as soon as I'm able, and encourage everyone to do so.
It appears I did going off the latest reply youve received from the original poster.
 
so if youve been dealt a shit hand in life, and you cant get vaccinated, you should now not go to pubs, events, nice holidays nothing, just simply exist until you expire?
Once we're 20% above herd iimmunity they can come out they're unlikely to infect others and unlikely to catch it themselves.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.