roubaixtuesday
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 4,468
- Team supported
- City
Also worth reflecting on how things have changed since instituting the single jab/ 3 months gap policy.
At that point, we weren't sure if the new variant could be controlled at all. Now it's clear the lock down is reducing cases by 20%+ per week, the single dose strategy makes much less difference. We're no longer in a race against an exponentially increasing virus.
Reducing the cases by 20% reduces the risk to the population by 20%. That's equivalent to vaccinating nearly 15 million people! Even taking into account that we've focused on most vulnerable, it shows just how important controlling the virus is.
If the vaccine really does give just 50% protection after one jab (pessimistic imv), three weeks of lock down reduces the risk the same as vaccinating the whole population once.
I think the uk approach is probably still best, but now makes little difference given current circumstances.
At that point, we weren't sure if the new variant could be controlled at all. Now it's clear the lock down is reducing cases by 20%+ per week, the single dose strategy makes much less difference. We're no longer in a race against an exponentially increasing virus.
Reducing the cases by 20% reduces the risk to the population by 20%. That's equivalent to vaccinating nearly 15 million people! Even taking into account that we've focused on most vulnerable, it shows just how important controlling the virus is.
If the vaccine really does give just 50% protection after one jab (pessimistic imv), three weeks of lock down reduces the risk the same as vaccinating the whole population once.
I think the uk approach is probably still best, but now makes little difference given current circumstances.