You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Could Pedro Porro be a long-term replacement for Walker?
- Thread starter PepGuardiola
- Start date
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 13,009
Zero guarantee of that though.So we don’t sign a player even though we could make 15/20m?
We pay 15m, then put him up for sale at 40. I dont think the spuds will be looking to do us a favor and hand us a quick 20m.
If we had another party who would agree a deal with us, it would be done.
Zero guarantee of that though.
We pay 15m, then put him up for sale at 40. I dont think the spuds will be looking to do us a favor and hand us a quick 20m.
If we had another party who would agree a deal with us, it would be done.
A club who offered 37m+ addons won’t find 35m a good deal
Also that would be bad in relationship between City and Sporting and they outright would not deal with us in the futureZero guarantee of that though.
We pay 15m, then put him up for sale at 40. I dont think the spuds will be looking to do us a favor and hand us a quick 20m.
If we had another party who would agree a deal with us, it would be done.
Also that would be bad in relationship between City and Sporting and they outright would not deal with us in the future
So what’s the point in doing them favours they agree to the deal with the buy back and then they cry and take there ball home if we use the buy back
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 13,009
Not if the money is going in our pocket no. Levy would fight you for the 10p he found on the floor.A club who offered 37m+ addons won’t find 35m a good deal
01cravend
Well-Known Member
So we don’t sign a player even though we could make 15/20m?
It's why I mentioned Angelino, could get him cheap, try him out then sell him on and still make money if he's not the right fit.
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 13,009
Sporting have no say in this if we want to execute the buyback. That isn't the issue here. Porro himself has to accept the terms of the deal and sign the contract with us first.So what’s the point in doing them favours they agree to the deal with the buy back and then they cry and take there ball home if we use the buy back
Of course you could believe that Txiki is incompetent and he doesn't want to make any money for City so is just letting this transfer go by also.
01cravend
Well-Known Member
Also that would be bad in relationship between City and Sporting and they outright would not deal with us in the future
What relationship with Sporting? Porro the only business we've ever done with them