Still not equitable numbers on either the size of population or the severity and length of lockdowns.
For our new poster to suggest that Nicola has done better is disingenuous.
Right, I hadn't realised just how different the reporting processes were between the home nations, so day-to-day (and their 7 day aggregates) are not suitable for comparison, sorry about that. However, I imagine that you used the same data sources to make your original claim that the Scottish death rate was twice the English one, so it seems like we are both standing on a shoogly peg with that.
I think (or should that be hope?) that the longer term data based on death certificates and excess deaths will perhaps be a bit more equivalent across the nations (assuming some consistency in doctors deciding to add corona virus to death certificates).
There are government figures for the calculation by death certificate and Travelling Tabby also gives death rates based on excess deaths over the average.(attached below).
These do not show a great difference between England and Scotland with England showing, by death certificate, overall 921 deaths per million against 820 for Scotland and England showing 1,044 deaths per million based on excess deaths against Scotland's 959. So I suggest that there is no basis for suggesting that Scotland's death rate is double that of England, at least overall and short term comparisons appear to be both unreliable and inappropriate.
I have been careful throughout not to suggest that Nicola has done better than Boris, other than in her presentation and communication. The difference between the two policies has not seemed to me to be that great in reality or in their effect, but it does seem to me that it has been presented in a more understanding and natural way by Nicola and her medical director.