Cricket Thread

The prime reason we lost this was the folly/arrogance of picking Bethell who has played virtually no first class cricket and when he did play he averaged 11 !!! Surely someone needs to ask Keys/McC/Stokes the question!!
Absolutely right. That and Smith unfathomably playing like he’s never held a bat before…
One other thing, which I suspect is not going to be universally popular, but, once they’d seen that pitch, Anderson should have been flown down straight away.
 
Thought both umpires a little suspicious today. Taking so long on decisions. Overton should have got the benefit of the doubt.
Fine margins in the end, an almost identical ball tracking yesterday wher the umpire had given not out.

That said, I saw a statistic where 66% of the runs were coming (I assume for India) and our bowlers were constantly bowling either straight or at the legs/body with little cover behind square on the leg side; compare that to India today where nearly everything was outside off stump, and largely pitched up.
 
Extremely annoying, that. I'm not bothered about a drawn series maybe being the correct outcome; that win was there for the taking. Twice. Lunch on the second day, we were 92/1, in reply to India's 224. We should have been looking at a lead of 150+ on first innings, probably 200. We ended up with a lead of 23. Not enough players used their heads, and were dismissed playing daft shots. Again, yesterday afternoon, we were 301/3 (effectively 4), needing 73 more runs for the win,with Brook and Root cruising along. Brook then loses his train of thought, and gets out to a crazy shot. Getting beat by an innings, or by 300 runs, would be (in some ways) easier to accept as we would never be in with a chance of winning such a game.
 
Extremely annoying, that. I'm not bothered about a drawn series maybe being the correct outcome; that win was there for the taking. Twice. Lunch on the second day, we were 92/1, in reply to India's 224. We should have been looking at a lead of 150+ on first innings, probably 200. We ended up with a lead of 23. Not enough players used their heads, and were dismissed playing daft shots. Again, yesterday afternoon, we were 301/3 (effectively 4), needing 73 more runs for the win,with Brook and Root cruising along. Brook then loses his train of thought, and gets out to a crazy shot. Getting beat by an innings, or by 300 runs, would be (in some ways) easier to accept as we would never be in with a chance of winning such a game.
Totally agree with you. Harry Brook throwing away his wicket was the pivotal moment yesterday & was completely unnecessary. Just brain dead cricket that exposed the rest of the team. Pretty shameful to have lost 6 wickets, for 66 runs in 23 overs.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top