Not forgetting our fielders dropping so many catches during India’s 2nd inningsAll on Brook this wank way of getting out Him and Root were cruising.
Not forgetting our fielders dropping so many catches during India’s 2nd inningsAll on Brook this wank way of getting out Him and Root were cruising.
Can you only have a runner when it’s a leg injury?Going to caught here going for it! Woakes can’t even run
FS are you a reformer ?I am sure I heard Nasser Hussain say it would have been a travesty if England had won this test.
Ummmmm.
True colours shining thru.
No haha i just dont like Nassar Hussein bias commentary towards India.FS are you a reformer ?
Harry Brook !
Agreed but without those 2 we wouldn’t have been anywhere near winning?Root threw his wicket away aswell.
Not sure the current Aussie batsmen are as good as previous ….Both teams would get walloped by the aussies.
Absolutely right. That and Smith unfathomably playing like he’s never held a bat before…The prime reason we lost this was the folly/arrogance of picking Bethell who has played virtually no first class cricket and when he did play he averaged 11 !!! Surely someone needs to ask Keys/McC/Stokes the question!!
Both Woakes injury and the dropped catches cost England dearly. Catches win matches as the saying goes.Woakes’ injury was the prime reason though.
Agreed but without those 2 we wouldn’t have been anywhere near winning?
38 extras in the first innings wasn’t great either.Both Wakes injury and the dropped catches cost England dearly. Catches win matches as the saying goes.
True, but I agree with other posts on here that say 3-1 would have been really unfair on India.38 extras in the first innings wasn’t great either.
Fine margins in the end, an almost identical ball tracking yesterday wher the umpire had given not out.Thought both umpires a little suspicious today. Taking so long on decisions. Overton should have got the benefit of the doubt.
Was thinking the same listening on the radio at workCan you only have a runner when it’s a leg injury?
In Australia. Neither side would be thrashed in home conditions.Both teams would get walloped by the aussies.
Totally agree with you. Harry Brook throwing away his wicket was the pivotal moment yesterday & was completely unnecessary. Just brain dead cricket that exposed the rest of the team. Pretty shameful to have lost 6 wickets, for 66 runs in 23 overs.Extremely annoying, that. I'm not bothered about a drawn series maybe being the correct outcome; that win was there for the taking. Twice. Lunch on the second day, we were 92/1, in reply to India's 224. We should have been looking at a lead of 150+ on first innings, probably 200. We ended up with a lead of 23. Not enough players used their heads, and were dismissed playing daft shots. Again, yesterday afternoon, we were 301/3 (effectively 4), needing 73 more runs for the win,with Brook and Root cruising along. Brook then loses his train of thought, and gets out to a crazy shot. Getting beat by an innings, or by 300 runs, would be (in some ways) easier to accept as we would never be in with a chance of winning such a game.