Dani Alves

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey dickhead, since I don't know how to read, please read that for me:

5Y2zsYA.jpg


http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2892...n-citys-top-centre-back-target-but-move-could


Okay. So now you think you're very smart although you have the intelligence of a dog, let's reconstruct my arguments including my previous arguments.

Sam Lee previously said that Pep might decide on not buying a defender if he sees an opportunity for Mbappe. At the time I had expressed some concern here with you, as your usual self, came out barking at me like the dog you are.

That's right, Sam Lee said City might not sign any central defenders at all.

Do you get the hint now when I said today "what happens if something happens to Kompany?" Do you get it now?

And today I wrote my concern about Dani Alves' age and said we should be getting our priority rightbacks and get Dani Alves on the side, and I expressed my concern by referring to an earlier Sam Lee article (see above) which basically said they might save the money for Mbappe.

Why? Because we're reading reports like City might be backing off from their priority targets because they're too expensive.

Like this:

7YOgou5.jpg


https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/jun/17/manchester-city-dani-alves-junventus

It's the Guardian, not the Sun. That's why I expressed concerned. You didn't know that either?

I'm also on the side of the argument that he's 34 and on a downward slope as he's 34 and that we should secure a first choice target for his position and Dani Alves should be the guy to rotate.

And as for Mbappe vs defensive reinforcements, I much rather prefer we get our priority defender targets and a solid DM than Mbappe, especially if we're getting Sanchez too but that's just me.

There are many ways to respond to an argument like that. Such as:


"People told you how your post was based on a mistake. Lots of people said it, politely."

"Alves isn't the only signing! The other deals will be done!"

That's right. Akira and this other bloke responded like a normal person and we were done.

We're just not done with you because you're a fucking idiot whose only aim seems to be to say the last word and to insult whoever you want with your dog-sized brain, probably because you were abused as a child.

You don't even fucking have an argument here.




because you don't have one and you're jealous and were abused when you were a child.

Hey, ive heard Mayweather-Mcgregor needs a undercard
 
Can you two wipe each other's fancies. There's actually transfer news to discuss
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.