Daniel Agger (continued)

[The perfect fumble]

"City need to pay the premium, this is the market they've established for themselves with their irresponsible overspending the last few years."

Well, it was responsible for them winning the league.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

If he was desperate to stay he would have explicitly said so. I'm sure he's attached to the club but so was SWP to City when he left us for Chelsea. Nowt wrong with that.

To paraphrase Groucho Marx: if he doesn't have the ambition to come to City, I wouldn't want him anyway.

 

[The Flash]

I will like to say i'm a scouser to avoid any further confusions

You guys must be confused to see lfc demand £27m for agger but it is justified ,
Basically, if Liverpool sell Agger for
£27m (-£6m initial fee already paid),
Brøndby will receive £3,15m and
Liverpool only £23,85.

liverpool has a clause with brondby to pay 15% of any fees we receive

So i have to say anything less than £25m will be rejected , which i am not sure man city will raise their offer to

wellcome.

this is the most impartial, independent , reliable , expert's site agger's rating

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/daniel-agger/mwverlaufgraph/spieler_22832.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/daniel-a ... 22832.html</a>

and for those who want to compare to thiago silva ....

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/thiago-silva/mwverlaufgraph/spieler_29241.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/thiago-s ... 29241.html</a>

Bless, i think you're being serious. Would City sell Lescott for €15m?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/manchester-city/kader/verein_281.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/manchest ... n_281.html</a>

Of course not, because his worth to you is far more than that.

City need to pay the premium, this is the market they've established for themselves with their irresponsible overspending the last few years.

Irresponsible spending? City? Bwuah hahahahaha!!! It could only be classed as irresponsible if we hadn't won anything.

Here's irresponsible:

Carroll - £35m
Henderson - £20m
Downing c.£15m - no goals, no assists

At least you've got your 'istreeeeeee.......

 

[Lancet Fluke]

I personally wont rate agger as a £27m player however considerung he's still world class , only 27 , £22m is a fair valuation to which city should agree , but if we have a 15% resale clause with brondby then it will rise to £25m to which city fans may disagree

I will love a 13m + adam johnson deal

Why should we have to pay your resale clause. He's not a £3m better player because of a clause inserted when he joined Liverpool.

I agree, it wouldn't make him worth 3 million more but it would make it less worth them selling him. Let's face it, they can ask what they want for him and can add that 3 mill if they like. Just as we are perfectly at liberty to fuck it off and chase another target if we don't want to pay that 3 mill.

 

[ecviper]

I will like to say i'm a scouser to avoid any further confusions

You guys must be confused to see lfc demand £27m for agger but it is justified ,
Basically, if Liverpool sell Agger for
£27m (-£6m initial fee already paid),
Brøndby will receive £3,15m and
Liverpool only £23,85.

liverpool has a clause with brondby to pay 15% of any fees we receive

So i have to say anything less than £25m will be rejected , which i am not sure man city will raise their offer to

wellcome.

this is the most impartial, independent , reliable , expert's site agger's rating

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/daniel-agger/mwverlaufgraph/spieler_22832.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/daniel-a ... 22832.html</a>

and for those who want to compare to thiago silva ....

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/thiago-silva/mwverlaufgraph/spieler_29241.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/thiago-s ... 29241.html</a>

Bless, i think you're being serious. Would City sell Lescott for €15m?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/manchester-city/kader/verein_281.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/manchest ... n_281.html</a>

Of course not, because his worth to you is far more than that.

City need to pay the premium, this is the market they've established for themselves with their irresponsible overspending the last few years.

Not this crap again. I thought it was just the rags that were deluded and forgot about their own historical antics in the transfer market.

 

[44%]

I personally wont rate agger as a £27m player however considerung he's still world class , only 27 , £22m is a fair valuation to which city should agree , but if we have a 15% resale clause with brondby then it will rise to £25m to which city fans may disagree

I will love a 13m + adam johnson deal

Why should we have to pay your resale clause. He's not a £3m better player because of a clause inserted when he joined Liverpool.

No , you don't have to pay but club will see it that way ,

suppose you had agger and someone wanted to buy him , you value him at £22m, will you let him go for £22m and then getting £19.7m or rather sell for £25m and receiving £21.7m ? Its only because you are buying that it seems unfair

 

[mad zab]

I will like to say i'm a scouser to avoid any further confusions

You guys must be confused to see lfc demand £27m for agger but it is justified ,
Basically, if Liverpool sell Agger for
£27m (-£6m initial fee already paid),
Brøndby will receive £3,15m and
Liverpool only £23,85.

liverpool has a clause with brondby to pay 15% of any fees we receive

So i have to say anything less than £25m will be rejected , which i am not sure man city will raise their offer to

wellcome.

this is the most impartial, independent , reliable , expert's site agger's rating

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/daniel-agger/mwverlaufgraph/spieler_22832.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/daniel-a ... 22832.html</a>

and for those who want to compare to thiago silva ....

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/thiago-silva/mwverlaufgraph/spieler_29241.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/thiago-s ... 29241.html</a>

Bless, i think you're being serious. Would City sell Lescott for €15m?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/manchester-city/kader/verein_281.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transfermarkt.it/en/manchest ... n_281.html</a>

Of course not, because his worth to you is far more than that.

City need to pay the premium, this is the market they've established for themselves with their irresponsible overspending the last few years.

LOL

Carrol 35m
Henderson 20m
Downing 18m

 

[moomba]

I personally wont rate agger as a £27m player however considerung he's still world class , only 27 , £22m is a fair valuation to which city should agree , but if we have a 15% resale clause with brondby then it will rise to £25m to which city fans may disagree

I will love a 13m + adam johnson deal

Why should we have to pay your resale clause. He's not a £3m better player because of a clause inserted when he joined Liverpool.

I agree, it wouldn't make him worth 3 million more but it would make it less worth them selling him. Let's face it, they can ask what they want for him and can add that 3 mill if they like. Just as we are perfectly at liberty to fuck it off and chase another target if we don't want to pay that 3 mill.

Remembering that he could potentially leave for nothing in to years time the question will be him confident Liverpool are that 'll re-sign.

Agger holds all the cards here, and if Liverpool want to put too high a price on him it could prove very costly for them.

 

[Lancet Fluke]

Why should we have to pay your resale clause. He's not a £3m better player because of a clause inserted when he joined Liverpool.

I agree, it wouldn't make him worth 3 million more but it would make it less worth them selling him. Let's face it, they can ask what they want for him and can add that 3 mill if they like. Just as we are perfectly at liberty to fuck it off and chase another target if we don't want to pay that 3 mill.

Remembering that he could potentially leave for nothing in to years time the question will be him confident Liverpool are that 'll re-sign.

Agger holds all the cards here, and if Liverpool want to put too high a price on him it could prove very costly for them.

Obviously it all changes if the player wants to agitate for a move but I'm not sure there are many signs of that happening. As it stands, Liverpool probably don't need or want to sell so they can certainly justify adding any sell on clause money to his asking price imo. For what it's worth, I don't think he is worth anything over 20 million but if we want him enough we will pay it, I suppose.

 

[44%]

Why should we have to pay your resale clause. He's not a £3m better player because of a clause inserted when he joined Liverpool.

I agree, it wouldn't make him worth 3 million more but it would make it less worth them selling him. Let's face it, they can ask what they want for him and can add that 3 mill if they like. Just as we are perfectly at liberty to fuck it off and chase another target if we don't want to pay that 3 mill.

Remembering that he could potentially leave for nothing in to years time the question will be him confident Liverpool are that 'll re-sign.

Agger holds all the cards here, and if Liverpool want to put too high a price on him it could prove very costly for them.

We'll either sell or he'll sign a new deal , otherwise i personally will be very angry to see him leave for far less next summer