You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Daniel Sturridge
- Thread starter Shauntheprofitmachine
- Start date
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
With the possible transfer of hazard to chelsea does this mean we may go for sturridge ?
bluebannana said:With the possible transfer of hazard to chelsea does this mean we may go for sturridge ?
I think he's more on a Tottenham or Liverpool level
bluemoondays
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 2,435
Tbh this is what baffles me why we let Onouha go for just £2.5m. He's no worse than any other top teams 4th choice CB and he could put in a shift at RB also. He's pretty much a guaranteed starter for a mid-low table PL club and you can't seriously get a lot better than that for 4th choice backup CB and squad player.
Add to that he's a blue, was probably not on huge wages and an academy graduate who counts towards CL squads it seems daft we didn't keep him. I'm pretty sure if BM had been bothered he could have improved him as a defender, it's not like he was thick or anything. Put it this way, I'd have been happier with Ned in the CB position than Savic (or even Kolo) when we had the Kompany sending off.
I could live with Bellamy and Adebayor going but this is one transfer I think BM did the wrong thing, if he can forgive and make up with Tevez then he could have sorted things out with Ned.
Add to that he's a blue, was probably not on huge wages and an academy graduate who counts towards CL squads it seems daft we didn't keep him. I'm pretty sure if BM had been bothered he could have improved him as a defender, it's not like he was thick or anything. Put it this way, I'd have been happier with Ned in the CB position than Savic (or even Kolo) when we had the Kompany sending off.
I could live with Bellamy and Adebayor going but this is one transfer I think BM did the wrong thing, if he can forgive and make up with Tevez then he could have sorted things out with Ned.
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
what you all wanted to hear from the Daily Star
MANCHESTER CITY READY IF DANIEL STURRIDGE QUITS CHELSEA
ABOVE: If Sturridge decides he has to move on, Manchester City boss Roberto Mancini will sit up and given that Chelsea also have Fernando Torres, Juan Mata, Ramires, Florent Malouda and Romelu Lukaku fighting for the attacking positions – and Brazil’s Hulk could be on the way, too – Sturridge looks unlikely to get as many games as he would like
3rd June 2012 By Hetho: Our man in the know
DANIEL STURRIDGE’S future at Chelsea is in increasing doubt as a result of the European champions’ early transfer business.
Sturridge, 22 lost his place in the starting line-up last season and his chances of regaining it have not been helped by the signings of German ace Marko Marin and now Belgium star Eden Hazard.
As he also failed to make England’s squad for Euro 2012, it’s believed that Sturridge is considering his options.
Marin, 23, is arriving at Stamford Bridge in a £6million deal from Werder Bremen and is confident that he will force his way into the side.
And at £30m, Hazard certainly can expect plenty of starts after Chelsea won their battle with the Manchester clubs for Lille’s wonder boy.
Given that Chelsea also have Fernando Torres, Juan Mata, Ramires, Florent Malouda and Romelu Lukaku fighting for the attacking positions – and Brazil’s Hulk could be on the way, too – Sturridge looks unlikely to get as many games as he would like.
If Sturridge decides he has to move on, Manchester City boss Roberto Mancini will sit up and take note.
As reported previously in this column, the Italian coach was dismayed that Sturridge was allowed to leave City for Chelsea before his arrival at the club.
The Stamford Bridge club won the battle for Hazard, 21, not only because they captured the Champions League and the underlying appeal that created but for financial reasons, too.
Hazard’s £8m-a-year wages weren’t a problem and Chelsea also struck a deal with his agent, John Bico.
He wanted £6m for his part in the switch and Chelsea reached a compromise agreement, whereas City and United felt they were paying enough with the fee and Hazard’s wages
MANCHESTER CITY READY IF DANIEL STURRIDGE QUITS CHELSEA
ABOVE: If Sturridge decides he has to move on, Manchester City boss Roberto Mancini will sit up and given that Chelsea also have Fernando Torres, Juan Mata, Ramires, Florent Malouda and Romelu Lukaku fighting for the attacking positions – and Brazil’s Hulk could be on the way, too – Sturridge looks unlikely to get as many games as he would like
3rd June 2012 By Hetho: Our man in the know
DANIEL STURRIDGE’S future at Chelsea is in increasing doubt as a result of the European champions’ early transfer business.
Sturridge, 22 lost his place in the starting line-up last season and his chances of regaining it have not been helped by the signings of German ace Marko Marin and now Belgium star Eden Hazard.
As he also failed to make England’s squad for Euro 2012, it’s believed that Sturridge is considering his options.
Marin, 23, is arriving at Stamford Bridge in a £6million deal from Werder Bremen and is confident that he will force his way into the side.
And at £30m, Hazard certainly can expect plenty of starts after Chelsea won their battle with the Manchester clubs for Lille’s wonder boy.
Given that Chelsea also have Fernando Torres, Juan Mata, Ramires, Florent Malouda and Romelu Lukaku fighting for the attacking positions – and Brazil’s Hulk could be on the way, too – Sturridge looks unlikely to get as many games as he would like.
If Sturridge decides he has to move on, Manchester City boss Roberto Mancini will sit up and take note.
As reported previously in this column, the Italian coach was dismayed that Sturridge was allowed to leave City for Chelsea before his arrival at the club.
The Stamford Bridge club won the battle for Hazard, 21, not only because they captured the Champions League and the underlying appeal that created but for financial reasons, too.
Hazard’s £8m-a-year wages weren’t a problem and Chelsea also struck a deal with his agent, John Bico.
He wanted £6m for his part in the switch and Chelsea reached a compromise agreement, whereas City and United felt they were paying enough with the fee and Hazard’s wages
Worst Case Ontario
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 2,238
- Location
- Me a aim fi the sky like plane...
- Team supported
- them a pray fi me fall like rain!!!
Shit player with head bigger than balls
Monkfish
Well-Known Member
Well he clearly isnt a shit player, but he would be less likely to figure as a first team regular for us than Chelsea, so not sure why he would want to swap one bench for another
jimharri
Moderator
Don't be silly. He is by no means a ''shit player''. Have you not seen Lee Cattermole, or the Liverpool incarnations of Downing, Henderson, Carroll and Adam? Now; they are shit players. I would agree re. the comment about him having a big head though. What's that old saying; ''His ego writes cheques that his talent can't cash''.Worst Case Ontario said:Shit player with head bigger than balls
Gabriel
Well-Known Member
Would he seriously push any of those we already have or better still dislodge them? We need better than what we have, better now and hungry now, not more bit-part players with potential.