Didsbury Dave said:
johnson28392 said:
mancity1 said:
I agree up until now DD but really would you expect him to say anything different or somewhat controversial at this stage of his punditory.
I cannot see anybody having a strong case for the removal of MP if we finish top three perhaps even dare I say it fourth this season.
i'm sure the targets for this season were to win one major trophy.
If Pellegrini wants to keep his job he has to
atleast come close to winning the league. Finishing third or fourth is not "coming close".
He's already come close to winning the league. Last year we were out of it in January, this year it is right to the wire.
His targets will not have been 'one major trophy'. They will have been all-round improvement and that has happened. When this squad fulfils it's potential the trophies will naturally follow. Managers are evaluated on the future as much as the past.
DD is correct in this instance , you have to remember what became of us toward the end of last season as well.
Also to date MP has managed the media far better than his predecessor and yes I don't pay much attention to it myself but others in influential positions obviously do.
To think he was told you must win the league this season or the Chumps League this season or you are out but we will give you three years is fanciful in the extreme.
This year its conceivable that you could finish 6 points behind the champions and still finish fifth.
if you think I making this up look at combinations.
Only Liverpool are guarenteed Chumps League football as I post this.
We are in best position to finish at least second at this point in time but this is a season of many twists and turns.
If we said at the start of the year we would be 74 points with four games to go especially after our first 6 away games I am sure the vast majority of our supporters and more importantly for MP the board and his direct employers would have taken that for sure.<br /><br />-- Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:08 am --<br /><br />
Didsbury Dave said:
johnson28392 said:
mancity1 said:
I agree up until now DD but really would you expect him to say anything different or somewhat controversial at this stage of his punditory.
I cannot see anybody having a strong case for the removal of MP if we finish top three perhaps even dare I say it fourth this season.
i'm sure the targets for this season were to win one major trophy.
If Pellegrini wants to keep his job he has to
atleast come close to winning the league. Finishing third or fourth is not "coming close".
He's already come close to winning the league. Last year we were out of it in January, this year it is right to the wire.
His targets will not have been 'one major trophy'. They will have been all-round improvement and that has happened. When this squad fulfils it's potential the trophies will naturally follow. Managers are evaluated on the future as much as the past.
DD is correct in this instance , you have to remember what became of us toward the end of last season as well.
Also to date MP has managed the media far better than his predecessor and yes I don't pay much attention to it myself but others in influential positions obviously do.
To think he was told you must win the league this season or the Chumps League this season or you are out but we will give you three years is fanciful in the extreme.
This year its conceivable that you could finish 6 points behind the champions and still finish fifth.
if you think I making this up look at combinations.
Only Liverpool are guarenteed Chumps League football as I post this.
We are in best position to finish at least second at this point in time but this is a season of many twists and turns.
If we said at the start of the year we would be 74 points with four games to go especially after our first 6 away games I am sure the vast majority of our supporters and more importantly for MP the board and his direct employers would have taken that for sure.