BillyShears said:supercity88 said:Spot on!
Me and you are gonna have to get a room soon mate ? :)
BillyShears said:Hahaha. I can smell the bitter from here. " he 'll never win as much as our Bob did".
Tragically comical from the resident dumb dumbs.
BlueSiam said:Good debate this.
Let's not forget the rags handed the League to us on a platter (after we lost it before that) by losing at Wigan and allowing Everton to come back from 4-2 at home. Forget about that amazing finale, all this talk about Mancini's great contribution would not exist if United could have defended a 2 goal lead for 15 mins. or whatever it was.
In short, had we won only the FA Cup under Mancini, my guess is most on here would not be wearing 'emotionally tinted Mancini coloured' glasses and have a different view on Pellegrini's early steps.
Don't you think this place would be better if we could reach an accord not to unduly be dismissive of Mancini or Pellegrini, and just talk about our club's positives, negatives and how we think we can improve, rather than the back and forth which is still happening far too often. It just seems like Parliament with a yah-boo mentality. Inners: Pellegrini can't organise a defence and doesn't have any trophy winning credentials. Outers: Mancini was hated and too defensive. Yah-boo, yah-boo.BillyShears said:Hahaha. That's good!
Really I think it's not that bad. Certainly not like it was last season. There's always been an element of pantomime to these discussions and I don't think it's any different with Pellegrini. For the most part we can all pick at each other without crossing the line into wanton abuse - although I must admit with one or two I find it hard ... ;)
Do we all want what's best for City? Yes we do and I think as long as that's the starting point, we'll survive this thread just as most of us survived the Mancini ones, and the Hughes ones before that, and the Sven ones before that.
Well the thing about drinking games isn't the amount of passion involved in the subjects you're observing, it's the number of repetitions that gets you. ;)BillyShears said:taconinja said:I would consider making a drinking game out of this place but I value having a functioning liver.Skashion said:Welcome to the bickering bitchfest on Bluemoon. Fanfuckingtastic.
Hahaha. That's good!
Really I think it's not that bad. Certainly not like it was last season. There's always been an element of pantomime to these discussions and I don't think it's any different with Pellegrini. For the most part we can all pick at each other without crossing the line into wanton abuse - although I must admit with one or two I find it hard ... ;)
Do we all want what's best for City? Yes we do and I think as long as that's the starting point, we'll survive this thread just as most of us survived the Mancini ones, and the Hughes ones before that, and the Sven ones before that.
We got 89 points. 89 points is a title-winning amount of points. The only time in English top flight football history when 89 points (3 points for a win adjusted) didn't win it is the 11/12 season. Mancini did not get lucky. He would have been ridiculously unlucky not to win it with 89 points.BlueSiam said:Good debate this.
Let's not forget the rags handed the League to us on a platter (after we lost it before that) by losing at Wigan and allowing Everton to come back from 4-2 at home. Forget about that amazing finale, all this talk about Mancini's great contribution would not exist if United could have defended a 2 goal lead for 15 mins. or whatever it was.
In short, had we won only the FA Cup under Mancini, my guess is most on here would not be wearing 'emotionally tinted Mancini coloured' glasses and have a different view on Pellegrini's early steps.
Skashion said:Don't you think this place would be better if we could reach an accord not to unduly be dismissive of Mancini or Pellegrini, and just talk about our club's positives, negatives and how we think we can improve, rather than the back and forth which is still happening far too often. It just seems like Parliament with a yah-boo mentality. Inners: Pellegrini can't organise a defence and doesn't have any trophy winning credentials. Outers: Mancini was hated and too defensive. Yah-boo, yah-boo.BillyShears said:Hahaha. That's good!
Really I think it's not that bad. Certainly not like it was last season. There's always been an element of pantomime to these discussions and I don't think it's any different with Pellegrini. For the most part we can all pick at each other without crossing the line into wanton abuse - although I must admit with one or two I find it hard ... ;)
Do we all want what's best for City? Yes we do and I think as long as that's the starting point, we'll survive this thread just as most of us survived the Mancini ones, and the Hughes ones before that, and the Sven ones before that.
Bibinho said:NOT PLAY JAVI AT ALL....