pominoz said:samharris said:Yet this is excactly what you are doing fella..those stats are based on facts not assumptions that if Edin hadnt scored someone else may have..
You cant argue against the truth...facts are what 'has' happened..assumptions are what 'could' happen.. Big difference...sorry did I say big,I meant monumental..
We have posters on here who dont rate Dzeko and put him at 4th choice striker behind 3 players who are not prem tested..
Now thats monumental, and not in a good sense. Judge players on what they have done for City not what you think they will do..
These players have a 40 goal deficit 'each' to make up before theyve even matched Edins achievements at City..
The very same way the Pelle has to get 1 title,1 FA cup & 1 charity shield to match Bob.
Ps.thats not a dig a Pelle before anyone starts..
I think his point is in response to all the "if we did not have Dzeko, we would not have won the League" post's.
I agree with him and pointed it out many pages ago, if we did not have Dzeko we would have had another 25 million+ striker, that may have done much better.
The TEAM won the League, not Dzeko.
Dzeko was and still is still part of the TEAM, so why is he getting the grief hes getting..
Surely any trophies are TEAM trophies and failures are TEAM failures and not due to any one player..Double standards if I ever saw them.
What Im getting from this forum is this..
1. Dzekos goals didnt contribute to us winning the title.
2. Dzekos lack of goals contributed to us not re-gaining the title..
youreallycouldnotmakethisfuckingbullshitup.com
Edit!!! 1.5 hours since I posted this and no replies..very strange..