Edin Dzeko

Status
Not open for further replies.
AntiUnited said:
spanishblue said:
levets said:
No... he didn't lead a revolt at all. He said he spoke in private to the chairman about the way he (personally) was being treated.

Considering how shit he was playing what a fukin snide. How long before he is back on the phone stabbing MP in the back?

And now hears the real motive of the post to degrade and to label shit. Same amount of goals half the games to neg,,, was mvp against newcastle 2ice now that set up neg... im guessing you where this vicious when teves took his pleasure cruise for half the season..

Do you have his picture on your bedroom wall ?
 
spanishblue said:
AntiUnited said:
spanishblue said:
Considering how shit he was playing what a fukin snide. How long before he is back on the phone stabbing MP in the back?

And now hears the real motive of the post to degrade and to label shit. Same amount of goals half the games to neg,,, was mvp against newcastle 2ice now that set up neg... im guessing you where this vicious when teves took his pleasure cruise for half the season..

Do you have his picture on your bedroom wall ?


i got a mini alter of him next to the tv.. im guessing you got the same for neg ?
 
AntiUnited said:
spanishblue said:
AntiUnited said:
And now hears the real motive of the post to degrade and to label shit. Same amount of goals half the games to neg,,, was mvp against newcastle 2ice now that set up neg... im guessing you where this vicious when teves took his pleasure cruise for half the season..

Do you have his picture on your bedroom wall ?


i got a mini alter of him next to the tv.. im guessing you got the same for neg ?

No I am not gay
 
pominoz said:
Bluemoonbaldboy said:
spanishblue said:
I don't know if it has been posted but an artical in the Daily Mirror saying that he was one of the players that led the revolt against RM. If so what a tw@t
fell for the headline if you read the article there is zero quotes saying about the dressing room just he went and spoke to Khaldoon about being unhappy. Some fair points a striker scores 4 then is benched is reason to speak to the bosses.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/edin-dzeko-admits-manchester-city-2668616

He admits he found it hard to understand why he was never given an extended run in the team and how he was shocked to be dropped after scoring four goals in a 5-1 win at Tottenham in August 2011.

Dzeko added: “At times, I believe that the coach failed to appreciate me as much as I thought I deserved, especially as there were many matches when I knew I had played very well.

“There was one game when I scored four goals and yet still I was left sitting on the bench for the next game. Surely that couldn’t be right.

“I can’t say why Mancini did it. We discussed it many times, but our opinions seemed to always differ.

“I was in a very difficult position. In a way, I didn’t want to complain because he (Mancini) took me to England and gave me the opportunity to play in the best league in the world.”

Ironically, after being assure by Pellegrini that he would be his first-choice striker, the 27-year-old has now fallen behind Sergio Aguero and new £18million signing Alvaro Negredo in the Chilean’s plans.

City’s interest in Borussia Dortmund’s Robert Lewandowski means City could offer Dzeko the chance to return to Germany in January in a swap deal.

But, in an interview on Bosnian TV, Dzeko said: “Pellegrini is good. Personally I am happy with him and, more importantly, all my team-mates are happy as well.

“He has introduced something new to the team, both in terms of the game we play and our off-the-field activities as well.

“He has restored our confidence and I am sure the next few seasons will be better than the last one.”

He added: “Every player wants to be in the starting 11 every week.

“Pellegrini brought Negredo with him from Spain, which implies that he must give him a chance to show his potential.

“There will be many matches ahead for us to fight for a position at the club.

“I don’t feel threatened by Negredo. It just raises the bat in terms of competition and it’s up to me to fight - and I will do so.

“I have never given up anything in my life so I certainly won’t be giving up now.

Why edit out the bit that was raised earlier?

"Edin Dzeko has confessed that he was part of the dressing-room revolt that saw Roberto Mancini sacked as manager of Manchester City.

The Bosnian striker admitted that he spoke to chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak on several occasions to voice his displeasure about how Mancini was running the club.

Mancini was axed less than 48 hours after City suffered a shock FA Cup defeat to Wigan - exactly a year to the day since he had guided the club to their first title in 44 years.

The hardline Italian was replaced by the more approachable Manuel Pellegrini.

And Dzeko revealed: “When the new coach arrived, the chairman asked me, informally, whether I was now happy.

“The question arose because I had complained to him a few times about the former coach and my situation at the club.

“There was only one major issue with Mancini and that was because of my dissatisfaction with my role as a player.

“When I spoke to the chairman it did not happen in front of the whole team.

“He was aware that I didn’t feel happy about what had happened to me over the last two years.

“This was only because I did not spend enough time on the field.”
Cut and paste didn't copy the top half but point still stands he doesn't mention dressing room unrest just he as an individual went to the chairman. The point he raises about being benched after scoring 4 is fair can remember plenty scratching their heads about that at the time
 
Bluemoonbaldboy said:
pominoz said:
Bluemoonbaldboy said:
fell for the headline if you read the article there is zero quotes saying about the dressing room just he went and spoke to Khaldoon about being unhappy. Some fair points a striker scores 4 then is benched is reason to speak to the bosses.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/edin-dzeko-admits-manchester-city-2668616

Why edit out the bit that was raised earlier?

"Edin Dzeko has confessed that he was part of the dressing-room revolt that saw Roberto Mancini sacked as manager of Manchester City.

The Bosnian striker admitted that he spoke to chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak on several occasions to voice his displeasure about how Mancini was running the club.

Mancini was axed less than 48 hours after City suffered a shock FA Cup defeat to Wigan - exactly a year to the day since he had guided the club to their first title in 44 years.

The hardline Italian was replaced by the more approachable Manuel Pellegrini.

And Dzeko revealed: “When the new coach arrived, the chairman asked me, informally, whether I was now happy.

“The question arose because I had complained to him a few times about the former coach and my situation at the club.

“There was only one major issue with Mancini and that was because of my dissatisfaction with my role as a player.

“When I spoke to the chairman it did not happen in front of the whole team.

“He was aware that I didn’t feel happy about what had happened to me over the last two years.

“This was only because I did not spend enough time on the field.”
Cut and paste didn't copy the top half but point still stands he doesn't mention dressing room unrest just he as an individual went to the chairman. The point he raises about being benched after scoring 4 is fair can remember plenty scratching their heads about that at the time


I wonder how many other players went behind his back?
 
Bluemoonbaldboy said:
pominoz said:
Bluemoonbaldboy said:
fell for the headline if you read the article there is zero quotes saying about the dressing room just he went and spoke to Khaldoon about being unhappy. Some fair points a striker scores 4 then is benched is reason to speak to the bosses.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/edin-dzeko-admits-manchester-city-2668616

Why edit out the bit that was raised earlier?

"Edin Dzeko has confessed that he was part of the dressing-room revolt that saw Roberto Mancini sacked as manager of Manchester City.

The Bosnian striker admitted that he spoke to chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak on several occasions to voice his displeasure about how Mancini was running the club.

Mancini was axed less than 48 hours after City suffered a shock FA Cup defeat to Wigan - exactly a year to the day since he had guided the club to their first title in 44 years.

The hardline Italian was replaced by the more approachable Manuel Pellegrini.

And Dzeko revealed: “When the new coach arrived, the chairman asked me, informally, whether I was now happy.

“The question arose because I had complained to him a few times about the former coach and my situation at the club.

“There was only one major issue with Mancini and that was because of my dissatisfaction with my role as a player.

“When I spoke to the chairman it did not happen in front of the whole team.

“He was aware that I didn’t feel happy about what had happened to me over the last two years.

“This was only because I did not spend enough time on the field.”
Cut and paste didn't copy the top half but point still stands he doesn't mention dressing room unrest just he as an individual went to the chairman. The point he raises about being benched after scoring 4 is fair can remember plenty scratching their heads about that at the time

How many more times do we have to do this?, he was rested for a CL game coming up the following week.
 
I think the reason he was benched after scoring four goals against Spurs was to rest him for a more important game coming up.

No player is happy not being in the first team and every player seems to have an ego larger than their brain.Dzeko will always score goals,the problem is when he isn't scoring his contribution to the team is limited.Mancini saw this and now Pellegrini has too,after saying he would be his first choice.For me Dzeko would only be first choice in less important games or as a sub if we need to shake things and need a goal.He isn't as good as he thinks he is but is not as bad as some fans say he is.....if that makes sense,lol?
 
paulchapo said:
I think the reason he was benched after scoring four goals against Spurs was to rest him for a more important game coming up.

No player is happy not being in the first team and every player seems to have an ego larger than their brain.Dzeko will always score goals,the problem is when he isn't scoring his contribution to the team is limited.Mancini saw this and now Pellegrini has too,after saying he would be his first choice.For me Dzeko would only be first choice in less important games or as a sub if we need to shake things and need a goal.He isn't as good as he thinks he is but is not as bad as some fans say he is.....if that makes sense,lol?

That is BS, Dzeko was and still is much better striker then Balo and Tevez. I understand Dzeko, It is not an easy thing to play for the club where they actually do not like you and have double standards just for you. Therefore he should leave in January. As the George Bush say "Full me once shame on you, full me twice shame on me". Dzeko should deffinetly be ashamed for not leaving in timmely manner. Now he is wasting his carrier in MC.
 
BosnianDragon said:
paulchapo said:
I think the reason he was benched after scoring four goals against Spurs was to rest him for a more important game coming up.

No player is happy not being in the first team and every player seems to have an ego larger than their brain.Dzeko will always score goals,the problem is when he isn't scoring his contribution to the team is limited.Mancini saw this and now Pellegrini has too,after saying he would be his first choice.For me Dzeko would only be first choice in less important games or as a sub if we need to shake things and need a goal.He isn't as good as he thinks he is but is not as bad as some fans say he is.....if that makes sense,lol?

That is BS, Dzeko was and still is much better striker then Balo and Tevez. I understand Dzeko, It is not an easy thing to play for the club where they actually do not like you and have double standards just for you. Therefore he should leave in January. As the George Bush say "Full me once shame on you, full me twice shame on me". Dzeko should deffinetly be ashamed for not leaving in timmely manner. Now he is wasting his carrier in MC.

So who do you think you will be supporting in January ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.