Bigga said:That's a really interesting view.
What does it say about a striker that plays 'poorly' yet has the ability to score anyway?
It says that he is a very capable footballer, when he wants.
Bigga said:That's a really interesting view.
What does it say about a striker that plays 'poorly' yet has the ability to score anyway?
AntiUnited said:west didsblue said:Because I get sick of reading the same old crap from you all the time.AntiUnited said:y go so personal ?
Im getting sick of reading the same shit over and over again when it comes to him being shit while actually having a decent game...
bugsyblue said:waspish said:The problem with Dzeko is we have 2 better strikers
Or debatably 3.
moomba said:Loukas said:Won it for us at Newcastle.
Came on and kept the scoring going against Norwich.
It's not the best time for people to complain about him when he is playing pretty well?
And at the end of the day his record speaks for itself.
My frustration with him is that despite a couple of goals and an assist, he's been incredibly poor in both games. Minimal effort, easily dispossesesed, poor body language, no fight.
JasminBosnia said:bugsyblue said:waspish said:The problem with Dzeko is we have 2 better strikers
Or debatably 3.
Round it to 10. So its three now plus two from EDS team, plus Michael Smith (22,Wimbledon on loan from Charlton), David Mooney (29,Leyton Orient) and pick three more from your neighborhood.
Matty said:Ultimately the Dzeko argument always comes down to the same thing, on the pro-Dzeko side of the fence you've got posters pointing out his past exploits (the QPR goal, his record at Wolfsburg etc) as well as his goalscoring record, whereas on the anti-Dzeko side of the fence you've got posters looking at the here and now and asking for more than just goals from Dzeko. It all depends where your views lie as to whether you're happy with what Dzeko is doing. Personally I think he needs to do more than score goals, we've got Aguero and Negredo who can score equally as often, if not more regularly, and they both bring other attributes to the table. Given our resources I don't think it's going out on a limb too much to say that we could sell Dzeko for a decent amount, and bring in another striker with the potential to score us 15-20 goals a season AND contribute in other ways to the first team. Dzeko is a little like Berbatov (although not as extreme an example), he'll never be a player who is overly bothered in anything else other than trying to score, which is great when he's scoring regularly, but for a club in City's current position we need more than that.
Pretty much sums up my feelings. I would always have Negredo over Dzeko as he offers so much more than goals.Matty said:Ultimately the Dzeko argument always comes down to the same thing, on the pro-Dzeko side of the fence you've got posters pointing out his past exploits (the QPR goal, his record at Wolfsburg etc) as well as his goalscoring record, whereas on the anti-Dzeko side of the fence you've got posters looking at the here and now and asking for more than just goals from Dzeko. It all depends where your views lie as to whether you're happy with what Dzeko is doing. Personally I think he needs to do more than score goals, we've got Aguero and Negredo who can score equally as often, if not more regularly, and they both bring other attributes to the table. Given our resources I don't think it's going out on a limb too much to say that we could sell Dzeko for a decent amount, and bring in another striker with the potential to score us 15-20 goals a season AND contribute in other ways to the first team. Dzeko is a little like Berbatov (although not as extreme an example), he'll never be a player who is overly bothered in anything else other than trying to score, which is great when he's scoring regularly, but for a club in City's current position we need more than that.