EU referendum

[bugsyblue]

He's hounded fuck all and is aggressive as a particularly laid back marmoset.

He asked a question of someone speaking about the independent research.

He asked the question over and over when he knows there's been a number reports done on the financial benefits because he was part of a discussion a number of pages back.

 

[Monkfish]

No need to do your own report mate, just a link to one of the many independent ones you base your opinion on would be fine. If you have never found one that's fine too, but do let me know as I'm excited to read it.

Save some excitement for midget porn but in the interim..
http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/brexit02.pdf

 

[Helmet Cole]

Why are you hounding that one poster? You've very aggressive and you very well know there's been a number independent surveys exploring the financial benefits of being an EU member. This is just one report that I posted earlier which you even commented on.

http://news.cbi.org.uk/reports/our-...t-2-benefits-of-eu-membership-outweigh-costs/

He asked the question over and over when he knows there's been a number reports done on the financial benefits because he was part of a discussion a number of pages back.

I was after the 'independent' reports. The CBI survey you posted is probably the nearest thing I've seen tbh.
As for aggressively hounding the other poster, I make no apology for calling him out on his bollocks. He likes to present opinion as fact, can't ever back it up and tries to either write of anyone who disagrees with him as a loon, or wriggle out of giving a straight answer to back up his point. I'm sure he's not alone but he has been the most prolific recently.

 

[SWP's back]

I was after the 'independent' reports. The CBI survey you posted is probably the nearest thing I've seen tbh.
As for aggressively hounding the other poster, I make no apology for calling him out on his bollocks. He likes to present opinion as fact, can't ever back it up and tries to either write of anyone who disagrees with him as a loon, or wriggle out of giving a straight answer to back up his point. I'm sure he's not alone but he has been the most prolific recently.

To be fair, he's no Ealing.

 

[Monkfish]

I was after the 'independent' reports. The CBI survey you posted is probably the nearest thing I've seen tbh.
As for aggressively hounding the other poster, I make no apology for calling him out on his bollocks. He likes to present opinion as fact, can't ever back it up and tries to either write of anyone who disagrees with him as a loon, or wriggle out of giving a straight answer to back up his point. I'm sure he's not alone but he has been the most prolific recently.

I can deal with hounding but you can keep your Americanism to yourself, I don't do 'called out'

I have not once said it was factual, only that every single shred of evidence says it is the most likely outcome and that your position has no evidence to support it, we clear now? If the economic well-being of the UK has less importance or no importance to you then fair enough I have no argument to your position

 

[Monkfish]

To be fair, he's no Ealing.

Ealing has far more tolerance for nonsense than I could ever have, and is a faster typer.

 

[Monkfish]

On a lighter issue, if we leave the EU will our European players have to apply for visas? Genuine question but I'm guessing yes. Wonder if that will affect the academy.

Probably not, guess the worst case would be some soft visa charge on entry but unlikely

 

[Helmet Cole]

I can deal with hounding but you can keep your Americanism to yourself, I don't do 'called out'

I have not once said it was factual, only that every single shred of evidence says it is the most likely outcome and that your position has no evidence to support it, we clear now? If the economic well-being of the UK has less importance or no importance to you then fair enough I have no argument to your position

What evidence?

 

[SWP's back]

Ealing has far more tolerance for nonsense than I could ever have, and is a faster typer.

Ealing does not hold a candle to you and is the main reason I favour out when I should vote in.

 

[SWP's back]

I can deal with hounding but you can keep your Americanism to yourself, I don't do 'called out'

I have not once said it was factual, only that every single shred of evidence says it is the most likely outcome and that your position has no evidence to support it, we clear now? If the economic well-being of the UK has less importance or no importance to you then fair enough I have no argument to your position

So if evidence isn't factual then what is it? It's certainly not evidence.

 

[Monkfish]

So if evidence isn't factual then what is it? It's certainly not evidence.

You cannot be factual about an event that has not happened, but ALL available independent study points to an outcome you do not agree with,I know it's problematic for you but I can do nothing about that, sorry

 

[Monkfish]

What evidence?

We just being silly now? Is this your concession speech¿

 

[Helmet Cole]

We just being silly now? Is this your concession speech¿

Your actually so arrogant that you haven't realised SWP did your homework for you a few posts ago :-)
Check out the report he linked to. It seems legit, and contains some facts to fill out your otherwise empty head and baseless arguments with. The pictures have already been coloured in, which is sad for us loons and thicko's.

 

[SWP's back]

You cannot be factual about an event that has not happened, but ALL available independent study points to an outcome you do not agree with,I know it's problematic for you but I can do nothing about that, sorry

I've already told you it's not problematic with me. Not sure why you can't understand that and sure a new boat would be lovely but I'm still not certain I agree with these studies and I'm sure willing to believe a few more may be along soon enough that point in the other direction.

Most economists can't predict six months ahead let alone 12 years.

 

[SWP's back]

You cannot be factual about an event that has not happened, but ALL available independent study points to an outcome you do not agree with,I know it's problematic for you but I can do nothing about that, sorry

Also, glad you agree that it is not evidence if it's not factual.

 

[Monkfish]

Your actually so arrogant that you haven't realised SWP did your homework for you a few posts ago :-)
Check out the report he linked to. It seems legit, and contains some facts to fill out your otherwise empty head and baseless arguments with. The pictures have already been coloured in, which is sad for us loons and thicko's.

You read the link I posted yet? You asked for it for post after post then it goes quiet when you get it, no thoughts? I won't 'call you out' on your abuse,I would probably do the same when I'm on the run, and Bojo is probably a bad influence

 

[Monkfish]

Also, glad you agree that it is not evidence if it's not factual.

Did I say that? Not sure I did and if I did I was wrong, sorry for confusing you

 

[SWP's back]

Did I say that? Not sure I did and if I did I was wrong, sorry for confusing you

It's ok, I guess you do it a few times.

So to get this straight. You believe evidence does not have to be based on facts?


Evidence (noun)

1The available body of facts indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid:

 

[Monkfish]

It's ok, I guess you do it a few times.

So to get this straight. You believe evidence does not have to be based on facts?


Evidence (noun)

1The available body of facts indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid:

I haven't expressed any opinion on that one way or the other, and it's not relevant to this thread what I think about that question.

What is relevant is that every single available independent study shows that a brexit will be disastrous for the UK economy. Now all these studies are based on facts, but there is obviously some speculation meaning some of the conclusions cannot be factual.

Clear?

Ps don't hold your breath waiting for a report saying the opposite, but feel free to post the info when/if you get it, I'm all ears

 

[SWP's back]

I haven't expressed any opinion on that one way or the other, and it's not relevant to this thread what I think about that question.

What is relevant is that every single available independent study shows that a brexit will be disastrous for the UK economy. Now all these studies are based on facts, but there is obviously some speculation meaning some of the conclusions cannot be factual.

Clear?

It's just you kept saying evidence and I was being silly and using the definition of evidence as opposed to your own version of it.

Silly of me as I say.

Also, you're now redefining the term "facts" but hey, this is your party I guess.