BigJoe#1
Well-Known Member
Kippaxwarrior, should e been @KippaxCitizenNot sure why you have tagged me this post as I've not posted on this thread for over a week!
Sorry mate, my mistake.
Kippaxwarrior, should e been @KippaxCitizenNot sure why you have tagged me this post as I've not posted on this thread for over a week!
That's bollocks Sam mate. You know for a fact my ability to travel around Europe depends on my coherent ability to use European flights.Oh ffs. Yes you have kids. People voting out also have kids.
Scouts will still be able to travel around Europe on holiday.
Keeping repeating you're voting for your kids is irrelevant. People voting out are doing so as they think it's better for them and their kids as well.
On Thursday do I vote for the same thing that is wanted by the BNP, UKIP, Britain First, EDL, Farage, Gove, The Sun and Daily Mail ?
Or do I vote the opposite ?
Hmm. Tough one
So you think free movement of labour works against the British?
Eh. No it doesn't. And nothing I said was bollocks.That's bollocks Sam mate. You know for a fact my ability to travel around Europe depends on my coherent ability to use European flights.
On Thursday do I vote for the same thing that is wanted by the BNP, UKIP, Britain First, EDL, Farage, Gove, The Sun and Daily Mail ?
Or do I vote the opposite ?
Hmm. Tough one
To clarify, do you think free movement of labour has a net positive impact on British born workers?Understanding of the language means that the UK presents itself as a positive choice for many Europeans looking to migrate.
Whether that works for or against the British depends upon your political/social/cultural perspective.
But he wasn"t talking about what we agreed with though was he ? And when we have disagreed we have lost 40 straight not really a recipe for change. We only win when we agree!Is that excluding the 98% votes we are on the winning side with?
To clarify, do you think free movement of labour has a net positive impact on British born workers?
I certainly do yes.I genuinely don't know.
The reason why I contributed to this thread was to challenge your assertion that migration works both ways equally.
Do you accept that the equation is more nuanced? That actually most workers in the European mainland have better cause and ability to work in the UK than vice verse?
But he wasn"t talking about what we agreed with though was he ? And when we have disagreed we have lost 40 straight not really a recipe for change. We only win when we agree!
I certainly do yes.
I didn't expect a lefty to pull me up on free movement of labour being a positive though.
That's the problem. It's a whole load of unknowns from both sides and no answers.Started off (selfishly) wanting to vote out. We're one of the 'bigger' players in the EU, which logically (in my head) means we'll be asked to input more than others to help the whole. We're also a small island, especially in terms of landmass and out infrastructure feels generally quite poor (public transport, roads etc) on a daily basis, especially compared to other European cities
However, (and imo the main point that needs to be taken away from this farce) is that both sides have gone into spin and hyperbole and no coherent argument has been presented for either side. For me, it's on the Leave campaign to show/prove that leaving the EU will be of a benefit to the country as a whole (and to myself). I'm more confused than when the debate started, better the devil you know and all that. So, felling forced to be conservative (with a small c), i'll be voting In.
Thought it interesting that for all the talk on immigration, it's actually a net contributor to the economy (or so it's being reported), i.e we (people paying tax in the UK) benefit from immigration as it currently stands. I also wonder that, should we leave, the money and resource we'd 'save' (which itself seems to be a debatable subject) would not cover the additional resource we would require short/medium/long term to set ourselves up independently. Thus costing the average UK taxpayer more and not 'giving our people and services i.e the NHS' additional funds.
I would yes, though I personally still think it's way down the line in terms of importance for this referendum.I'm only a lefty when compared to you.
But otherwise, you accept that the migration of labour is a much more sophisticated, ambiguous and culturally sensitive issue compared to the migration of capital?
I would yes, though I personally still think it's way down the line in terms of importance for this referendum.
Anyway, the only thing I'm right wing on is economic policy.
I couldn't be more yoghurt knitting and liberal on everything else.
The NHS is exempt but don't let the facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory!
On Thursday do I vote for the same thing that is wanted by the BNP, UKIP, Britain First, EDL, Farage, Gove, The Sun and Daily Mail ?
Or do I vote the opposite ?
Hmm. Tough one
But we won't save money, we'll lose money because we'll miss out on so many of the benefits of being in the EU and I reckon the EU will make a point of being hard to work with, with us, because they won't want others to leave so negotiating our own trade like Norway do won't happen because if it's that easy for us it'll be that easy for everyone else and in the end many will leave the EU.That's the problem. It's a whole load of unknowns from both sides and no answers.
If we leave, will the money we save be put towards public services?
If we stay, will TTIP end the NHS? What will the EU be like in 10 years? Federation? Will there be an army?
NO one bloody knows and that's the biggest problem