Everton (a) post-match thread

[laplandblue]

We almost handed it over the dippers - that's when you decide before a game to play only one half.
Saying all that, the second half was exceptionally good, just made them passengers.
Foden is turning into a little shitty turd, but our turd nonetheless and love him for that even more
Did I say I love Foden, the perfect cross between a ninja and a snow leopard, even a bit of Cancelo shithousery rubbed on.
Listening to that former AV lump on tS shedding bitter tears of disappointment on a penalty decision was like drinking the sweetest nectar of them all.
I am diagnosed with acute Plantar fasciitis of my left foot, so in all probability no more games at Etihad this season unfortunately
CTID!

I hope this helps, I had a herniated disc in my lower back a few years ago. I read that avoiding wheat could help a lot because it can make any problems flare up.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

So why did the Ref clearly indicate an offside after the var review?

Because Everton were offside in their attack after the handball incident and play had naturally stopped with a free kick for that offside.

 

[hilts]

So why did the Ref clearly indicate an offside after the var review?

It was a penalty every day of the week but if there was an offside I couldn’t say. We were crap let’s hope next week we are not.

 

[Academica]

People just want to say we won without any luck. We didn’t.

In the banter/troll world of football, decisions like this get quoted forever, so if it can be dismissed as it was offside, then

It showed it was close. It didn’t show it was offside.

It didn't show it was onside either.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Sky know as they are able to listen to all ref/var communications but let’s not let that get in the way of their narrative eh?

It wasn’t offside until after Rodri had controlled the ball, the ball cleared and they were then offside in the subsequent attack.

 

[Gogootz]

Because Everton were offside in their attack after the handball incident and play had naturally stopped with a free kick for that offside.

Who was offside then? Rodri kicks it out

 

[DMA's]

So why did the Ref clearly indicate an offside after the var review?

Because the play was stopped from an offside that occurred after the handball appeal (think it was against Gordon). Then they checked var for the handball, decided it wasn’t handball so the game restarted for the offside that was given after the appeal.

The Richarlason offside wasn’t even checked as they didn’t think it was handball

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

It didn't show it was onside either.

It doesn’t have to. If it had been offside in the build up, VAR would have shown their working out of that.

It wasn’t offside and we were lucky to not have a penalty given against us.

 

[bennyboy]

So why did the Ref clearly indicate an offside after the var review?

The handball incident was before the offside.
No penalty given then the offside followed after.
Var checked the penalty claim.No penalty so the original offside after the claim was given.

 

[blueinsa]

It wasn’t offside until after Rodri had controlled the ball, the ball cleared and they were then offside in the subsequent attack.

Rodri kicks the ball out so who is offside then?