okstate99
Well-Known Member
leewill31 said:
Very good point.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ezequiel Lavezzi
- Thread starter Tez Tosterone
- Start date
Very good point.
Tricky_Trev
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 32,020
Tevez was intentionally trying to look shit... to lower his value. ;)okstate99 said:leewill31 said:Blue Haze said:Saw him playing for Argentina. Looked ineffective, didn't do much. Seen him a few times at club level and didn't look like a 20m+ anything.
so did tevez!
Very good point.
The Game 77
Well-Known Member
Dax777 said:He is fast, but strong and skillful too. He looks like Tevez when he dribbles and looks like Bellamy when he puts on the jets, Sounds like a perfect match for most bluemooners, or so I thought. Now folks are getting me all confused.bonespost said:is he a argentinian bellamy ??????on to dax
Has my rantings for more intelligent players like Pastore, Mata and Cazorla planted a new seed in these parts?
Dax i am with you 100% with regards to Pastore seen him a few times and he might not be as flashy as other players we have been linked with.But he would improve our team/squad
immensely. I call him the thinking man's footballer
Um, he's VERY flashy, but I like it :DThe Game 77 said:Dax i am with you 100% with regards to Pastore seen him a few times and he might not be as flashy as other players we have been linked with.
LongsightM13 said:Well, they both need to show a hell of a lot more next season. Big season coming up for both of them.Sam_B said:Dax777 said:Perhaps we don't need a replacement for Tevez. If we sell Tevez and brought in Mata, Modric and Neymar/Rossi (For those who are deadly anti-Neymar :P). We would be a better team, without having replaced Tevez.
^^^^ this. I personally dont think we need or can get a direct replacement for tevez in terms of the way tevez plays, we have our goalscorers in dzeko and balotelli, what we need is someone who can sit behind the main striker and cause havoc in the way tevez did (and of course bag a goal or two), so the likes of hulk etc. Obviously i wont be complainig if we brought in say... higuain, the main factor is none of us definatly know what formation mancini wants to play, if we did it would be a hell of alot easier to try and figure out what sort of player we need/are looking at.
Im just gonna roll with it and see how this all pans out.
Mario had a pretty good goal/game ratio.
Bluemooner33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 1,300
We should go all out for Darren Bent, he'd score 30+ with our midfield feeding him, a natural goal scorer proven in the premier league
.Young said:If Mancini rates him, he should have some standard to his play. But his goal ratio meant that hes not a prolific striker, we need a prolific striker to replace Tevez.
I like Lavezzi but not exactly the right player we need now.
Disagree. We have two prolific goal scorers in Dzeko and Mario. Tevez is prolific in part because he is greedy. Get him out of here and lets spread the goals around. We will have a much better team as a result and have more success overall.
Bluemooner33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 1,300
jjeangi said:Definite clarkie.Bluemooner33 said:We should go all out for Darren Bent, he'd score 30+ with our midfield feeding him, a natural goal scorer proven in the premier league
How do you know about Clarkie?? you've only been here 2mins LoL :-)
bobmcfc said:anyone reckon they ditched the cahill deal because we all thought he was shite and didn't want him ? ;)
I wondered that myself. In the event it is true:
SAY NO TO LAVEZZI
SAY YES TO AGUERO (and/or Mata, or Pastore)